16.03.2014 Views

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

1 Q (By Mr. Lawdermilk) I'm really ask<strong>in</strong>g a simple<br />

2 question.<br />

3 A Simple questions often have great<br />

4 implications.<br />

5 Q Well, just because you don't want to answer<br />

6 it, doesn't mean --<br />

7 MR. LIGHTY: Object to <strong>the</strong> form. Object<br />

8 to side-bar.<br />

9 Q As an expert witness for franchisors, have you<br />

10 ever had an occasion to have <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

11 fault with <strong>the</strong> franchisor's actions?<br />

12 A My reports don't often deal with just actions.<br />

13 Q But as an expert witness for <strong>the</strong> franchisors,<br />

14 have you ever found fault with <strong>the</strong> franchisors?<br />

15 MR. LIGHTY: Object to <strong>the</strong> form.<br />

16 A I can't answer that question <strong>the</strong> way it is<br />

17 asked.<br />

18 Q In any case that you have been an expert<br />

19 witness, have you ever <strong>no</strong>t found that it was <strong>the</strong><br />

20 franchisee's responsibility?<br />

21 A The way I can answer that statement - and I<br />

22 th<strong>in</strong>k possibly get at what you are ask<strong>in</strong>g - is to say<br />

23 that my op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> my expert reports that are listed on<br />

24 that document, No. 7 - Exhibit 7 - have supported <strong>the</strong><br />

25 position of <strong>the</strong> franchisor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!