16.03.2014 Views

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46<br />

1 Q Would you still have that report on your<br />

2 computer?<br />

3 A I don't th<strong>in</strong>k we had computers. I don't k<strong>no</strong>w.<br />

4 Q Do you remember any of <strong>the</strong> attorneys <strong>in</strong>volved?<br />

5 A I do <strong>no</strong>t.<br />

6 Q But it was <strong>in</strong> Harris County?<br />

7 A It was <strong>in</strong> Dallas. It was a suburb of Dallas.<br />

8 So, I'm <strong>no</strong>t even sure what county it was <strong>in</strong>.<br />

9 Q I'm talk<strong>in</strong>g about Marble Slab. You have it<br />

10 listed as 269th Judicial District Court of<br />

11 Harris County.<br />

12 A Then it was. The location was <strong>in</strong> Dallas.<br />

13 Q What about Lyons versus Southland Corp.? What<br />

14 did you do for <strong>the</strong>m?<br />

15 A I believe that was a case where <strong>the</strong> franchise<br />

16 candidate was go<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> required tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />

17 satisfactory completion of which is part of <strong>the</strong> grant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

18 of <strong>the</strong> franchise, and toward <strong>the</strong> latter part of that<br />

19 tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>y had decided - if I'm remember<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

20 correctly - to reject <strong>the</strong> franchise candidate <strong>in</strong><br />

21 tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and a lawsuit resulted from that.<br />

22 Q So, it was an employment case?<br />

23 MR. LIGHTY: Object to <strong>the</strong> form.<br />

24 A No, it was <strong>no</strong>t an employment case because we<br />

25 are talk<strong>in</strong>g about a franchisee <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g who was <strong>no</strong>t

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!