17.03.2014 Views

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CMS-1345-P 171<br />

data collection and reporting.<br />

• Exhibit sensitivity to administrative burden and seek to become less<br />

burdensome over time.<br />

c. Proposed Quality Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards<br />

that <strong>ACO</strong>s Must Meet for Shared Savings<br />

Based upon the principles described, we are proposing 65 measures (see Table 1)<br />

for use in the calculation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ACO</strong> Quality Performance Standard. We propose that<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>s will submit data on these measures using the process described later in this<br />

proposed rule and meet defined quality performance thresholds. We propose that <strong>ACO</strong>s<br />

be required to report quality measures and meet applicable performance criteria, as<br />

defined in rulemaking, for all 3 years within the 3-year agreement period to be considered<br />

as having met the quality performance standard. Specifically, for the first year <strong>of</strong> the<br />

program, we propose for the quality performance standard to be at the level <strong>of</strong> full and<br />

accurate measures reporting; for subsequent years, we propose the quality performance<br />

standard be based on a measures scale with a minimum attainment level as described in<br />

section II.E.4 <strong>of</strong> this proposed rule.<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>s that do not meet the quality performance thresholds for all proposed<br />

measures would not be eligible for shared savings, regardless <strong>of</strong> how much per capita<br />

costs were reduced. Specifically, as discussed in section II.H. <strong>of</strong> this proposed rule, in<br />

those instances where an <strong>ACO</strong> fails to meet the minimum attainment level for 1 or more<br />

domains, we propose to give the <strong>ACO</strong> a warning and to re-evaluate the following year. If<br />

the <strong>ACO</strong> continues to underperform on the quality performance standards in the<br />

following year, the agreement will be terminated. We also propose that if an <strong>ACO</strong> fails

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!