17.03.2014 Views

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CMS-1345-P 275<br />

• Among older adults, the presence <strong>of</strong> an RHC in the county reduced ambulatory<br />

care sensitive (ACS) conditions admission rates, compared to counties in which an RHC<br />

was not present. 16<br />

• RHCs <strong>of</strong>fer financially accessible care to low income individuals; 96 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

independent RHCs surveyed <strong>of</strong>fer free care, sliding fee scales, or both. 17<br />

Accordingly, because FQHCs and RHCs are unable to participate independently<br />

in this program, we believe providing incentives to <strong>ACO</strong>s that include FQHCs and/or<br />

RHCs as <strong>ACO</strong> participants is in the interest <strong>of</strong> the Shared Savings Program as<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> these types <strong>of</strong> entities will promote care coordination and the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

efficient, high-quality health care. Therefore, we are proposing, for the one-sided model,<br />

up to a 2.5 percentage point increase in the sharing rate for <strong>ACO</strong>s that include these<br />

entities as <strong>ACO</strong> participants. We propose establishing a sliding-scale payment, outlined<br />

in the following table, based on the number <strong>of</strong> Medicare FFS beneficiaries with one or<br />

more visit at an <strong>ACO</strong>'s participant FQHC or RHC during the performance year.<br />

Table 7: Sliding Scale Payment Based on Number <strong>of</strong> Beneficiary Visits at an<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>'s Participant FQHC or RHC<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>ACO</strong> Assigned Beneficiaries With 1<br />

or More Visits to an <strong>ACO</strong> participant FQHC/RHC<br />

During the Performance Year<br />

1-10% 0.5<br />

11-20% 1<br />

21-30% 1.5<br />

31-40% 2<br />

41-50% 2.5<br />

Percentage Point Increase<br />

in Shared Savings Rate<br />

(One-Sided Model)<br />

16 Probst, J.C., Laditka, J., and Laditka, S. (2009). "Community Health Center and Rural Health Clinic<br />

Presence Associated with Lower County-Level Hospitalization Rates for Ambulatory Care Sensitive<br />

Conditions." South Carolina Rural Health Research Center.<br />

17 Hartley, D., Gale, J. Leighton, A. and Bratesman, S. (2010). "Are Rural Health Clinics Part Of The<br />

Rural Safety Net?" Muskie School <strong>of</strong> Public Service; Maine Rural Health Research Center.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!