17.03.2014 Views

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CMS-1345-P 266<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>s, especially physician organized <strong>ACO</strong>s and smaller <strong>ACO</strong>s in rural areas, from<br />

participating in the program. In contrast, a lower MSR would encourage more potential<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>s to participate in the program, but would also provide less confidence that savings<br />

are a result <strong>of</strong> improvements in quality and efficiency made by an <strong>ACO</strong>.<br />

We believe that the most appropriate policy concerning determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"appropriate percent" for the MSR would achieve a balance between the advantages <strong>of</strong><br />

making incentives and rewards available to successful <strong>ACO</strong>s and prudent stewardship <strong>of</strong><br />

the Medicare Trust Funds. For the one-sided model we are proposing a sliding scale<br />

confidence interval (CI) based on the number <strong>of</strong> assigned beneficiaries. The MSR would<br />

be established for each <strong>ACO</strong> based on increasing nominal confidence intervals for larger<br />

<strong>ACO</strong>s so that an <strong>ACO</strong> with the minimum 5,000 assigned beneficiaries would have an<br />

MSR based on a 90 percent CI; an <strong>ACO</strong> with 20,000 assigned beneficiaries would have a<br />

MSR based on a 95 percent CI and an <strong>ACO</strong> with 50,000 assigned beneficiaries would<br />

have an MSR based on a 99 percent CI. In addition, the MSR would not be allowed to<br />

fall below 2 percent for larger <strong>ACO</strong>s.<br />

An <strong>ACO</strong> that exceeds its MSR would be eligible to share up to 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

savings in the one-sided model (based on quality performance), as discussed in section<br />

II.E. <strong>of</strong> this proposed rule. Table 6 displays the minimum savings rate an <strong>ACO</strong> would<br />

have to achieve before savings could be shared based on the number <strong>of</strong> its assigned<br />

beneficiaries.<br />

In order to improve the opportunity for groups <strong>of</strong> solo and small practices to<br />

participate in the Shared Savings Program, we are proposing to vary confidence intervals<br />

by the size <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ACO</strong>, which is determined based on the number <strong>of</strong> assigned

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!