17.03.2014 Views

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CMS-1345-P 277<br />

<strong>of</strong> dual eligible beneficiaries and includes several provisions to address their special<br />

needs. For instance, section 2602 <strong>of</strong> the Affordable Care Act established a Federal<br />

Coordinated Health Care Office within CMS to bring together <strong>of</strong>ficers and employees <strong>of</strong><br />

the Medicare and Medicaid programs at CMS to: (1) more effectively integrate benefits<br />

under the Medicare and Medicaid programs; and (2) improve the coordination between<br />

the Federal government and States for individuals eligible for benefits under both such<br />

programs in order to ensure that these individuals receive full access to the items and<br />

services to which they are entitled under titles XVIII and XIX <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

Additionally section 1899(j) <strong>of</strong> the Act provides that "[t]he Secretary may give<br />

preference to <strong>ACO</strong>s who are participating in similar arrangements with other payers."<br />

The statute prescribes neither the kind <strong>of</strong> preference that the Secretary should provide to<br />

such <strong>ACO</strong>s nor what other types <strong>of</strong> arrangements should be considered "similar" for<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> such a preference. We believe that the more patients an <strong>ACO</strong> sees for which<br />

it is eligible to receive performance-based incentives, such as shared savings, the more<br />

likely it is that the <strong>ACO</strong> will adopt substantial behavior changes conducive to improved<br />

quality and cost savings.<br />

We are seeking comment on methods to provide preference to <strong>ACO</strong>s that serve a<br />

large dual-eligible population or that enter and maintain similar arrangements with other<br />

payers. Specifically we seek comment regarding suggestions to encourage accountability<br />

for dual-eligible beneficiaries and participation in similar arrangements with other types<br />

<strong>of</strong> payers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!