17.03.2014 Views

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

(ACO) regulations - American Society of Anesthesiologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CMS-1345-P 254<br />

actual expenditures for an <strong>ACO</strong>. However, section 1899(d)(1)(B)(i) <strong>of</strong> the Act only<br />

provides authority to adjust expenditures in the performance period for beneficiary<br />

characteristics and does not provide authority to adjust for "other factors". Therefore,<br />

while we may adjust the benchmark under this provision by removing IME and DSH<br />

payments, we could not also do so in our calculation <strong>of</strong> performance year expenditures.<br />

If we were to remove IME and DSH payments from the benchmark, the benchmark<br />

would be set artificially lower relative to the performance period, thus making it more<br />

difficult for an <strong>ACO</strong> to overcome and achieve savings under this program. In addition,<br />

excluding these payments would result in an artificial and incomplete representation <strong>of</strong><br />

actual spending <strong>of</strong> Medicare Trust Fund dollars. Further, section 1899(d)(1)(B)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act requires that we update an <strong>ACO</strong>'s benchmark during each year <strong>of</strong> the agreement<br />

period based on a national standard ("the projected absolute amount <strong>of</strong> growth in national<br />

per capita expenditures for parts A and B under the original Medicare fee-for-service<br />

program"), which would necessarily include the effects <strong>of</strong> these payments. Additionally,<br />

we believe all relevant Medicare costs should be included in an <strong>ACO</strong>'s benchmark to<br />

maintain sufficient incentives for <strong>ACO</strong>s to ensure their assigned beneficiaries receive<br />

care in the most appropriate settings. For example, <strong>ACO</strong>s that include teaching and/or<br />

DSH hospitals in their network might be more interested in joining the program if we do<br />

not remove these payments from the calculations. This is because including these<br />

payments would result in higher benchmarks against which such <strong>ACO</strong>s would work to<br />

achieve savings, and such <strong>ACO</strong>s may be able to earn back a portion <strong>of</strong> forgone IME/DSH<br />

payments in the form <strong>of</strong> shared savings in cases where a referral to a less intensive setting<br />

is most appropriate for the beneficiary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!