22.03.2014 Views

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Klamath</strong> Project Operations <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Endangered Suckers: Review of Proposed Action<br />

lake elevation was at or greater than 4142.5 ft between 1995 and 2002, larval<br />

production for size 15 mm total length was relatively low (1995, 1997, 1998,<br />

2000, and 2005; Figure 2-23, Markle 2007).<br />

In the other two years where June 15 lake elevation was above 4142.5 ft, larval<br />

sucker abundances were the highest observed larval abundances in the 10-year<br />

record presented. In years when mid-June lake elevation were below 4142.5 ft,<br />

larval sucker production was low, but similar to larval abundances in 8 of the 10<br />

study years, including years when mid-June elevation was higher than 4142.5 ft.<br />

Markle (2007) indicates that larval sucker production, or year class formation,<br />

appeared to respond to largescale climate indices and that the lake management<br />

regime from 1995 to 2005 may have resulted in better year class formations under<br />

different climate regimes.<br />

Figure 2-23. UKL relationship between June 15 lake elevation (red x) and larval sucker<br />

abundance for larvae of 15 mm total length (LPE15; blue square) from 1995 through<br />

2005.<br />

The relationship between larval year class formation and larval survival from<br />

1995 to 2005 <strong>is</strong> also d<strong>is</strong>cussed in Markle and Dunsmoor (2007). A direct<br />

relationship between larval abundance and lake elevation from the 1995 through<br />

2005 data <strong>is</strong> difficult to ascertain since several years with high lake elevation also<br />

had low larval sucker abundance (Figure 2-24). The authors indicate that larval<br />

sucker survival may be related inversely to fathead minnow abundance (Markle<br />

and Dunsmoor 2007). Lower lake elevations may favor fathead minnow<br />

abundance and negatively influence larval sucker survival (Figure 2-24; Markle<br />

and Dunsmoor 2007).<br />

Also confounding the relationship between larval sucker abundance and lake level<br />

management <strong>is</strong> the prevailing current in UKL that generally flows s<strong>out</strong>herly along<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!