22.03.2014 Views

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Klamath</strong> Project Operations <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Coho Salmon: Effects of the Proposed Action on Coho Salmon<br />

Table 3-25. Summary of available juvenile and fry coho salmon habitat at proposed<br />

minimum flows and at the modeled 50 percent exceedence levels for four reaches.<br />

(Study Reach Summary Results)<br />

Reach 1<br />

R. Ranch<br />

Coho<br />

Salmon<br />

Life<br />

Stage<br />

Juvenile<br />

Coho Salmon Available Habitat<br />

October through September<br />

Proposed<br />

Minimum<br />

Flows<br />

91% to 100%, or<br />

down to (99%)<br />

Modeled 50%<br />

Exceedence<br />

92% to 100%, or<br />

down to (96%)<br />

March through<br />

June<br />

Modeled 50%<br />

Exceedence<br />

Down to (98%), to<br />

down to (96%)<br />

Fry 80% to 88% 80% to 100% 89% to 100%<br />

Juvenile 36% to 42% 37% to 43% 37% to 43%<br />

Trees of<br />

Heaven 2 Fry 89% to 94% 86% to 100%, or<br />

down to (96%)<br />

86% to 100%, or<br />

down to (96%)<br />

Brown Juvenile Down to (79%), Down to (78%), Down to (54%),<br />

Bear 2 down to (57%) down to (41%) down to (41%)<br />

Fry 35% to 36% 34% to 56% 34% to 56%<br />

Seiad 2 Juvenile 45% to 46% 44% to 51% 44% to 51%<br />

Fry 97% to 100% 97% to 100%, or 100%, down to<br />

down to (93%) (93%)<br />

1 The percentage in () in the available habitat range indicates flows above the maximum<br />

available habitat flow. Once the flow <strong>is</strong> at the maximum available habitat levels, increase flows<br />

would reduce the available fry habitat.<br />

2<br />

Reclamation applied the minimum and 50 percent exceedence model flows at IGD directly to<br />

these reaches to determine coho salmon available habitat. Th<strong>is</strong> would assume minimum<br />

tributary input. However, it <strong>is</strong> likely that flows would be much greater under these assumed<br />

IGD flows at these reaches, particularly given tributary inputs. Thus, the flows considered to<br />

determine the percent of available habitat should be considered minimums.<br />

Spawning Habitat<br />

Under the current (NMFS 2002 BO) and under the Proposed Action, the October<br />

through February minimum flow requirements are the same. Th<strong>is</strong> minimum flow<br />

regime, for th<strong>is</strong> time period (1,300 cfs), for all NMFS year types, was based on<br />

limited measurements and observations “that fall Chinook [salmon] spawning<br />

habitat would be adequate in the IGD to Shasta River reach under th<strong>is</strong> IGD<br />

d<strong>is</strong>charge” (p. 68, NMFS 2002). NMFS further assumed that main stem passage,<br />

tributary access, and spawning habitat for coho salmon will also be adequate<br />

under th<strong>is</strong> IGD flow regime.<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!