Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Klamath Project Operations Biological Assessment Literature Cited: Conservation Measures Bennetts, D., C. Korson, and R. Piaskowski. 2004. A-canal fish screen monitoring and evaluation activities, 2003. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, OR. Bienz, C.S. and J.S. Ziller. 1987. Status of three lacustrine sucker species (Catostomidae). Report to the USFWS, Sacramento, California. 39 p. Bodensteiner, L. R., R. J. Sheehan, P. S. Wills, A. M. Brandenburg, and W. M. Lewis. 2000. Flowing water: an effective treatment for Ichthyophthiriasis. J. Aqua. Animal Health 12: 209-219. Borthwick, S.M., and E.D. Weber. 2001. Larval fish entrainment by Archimedes lifts and an internal helical pump at Red Bluff research pumping plant, Upper Sacramento River, California. Red Bluff Plant Report Series, volume 12, Bureau of Reclamation, Red Bluff, CA. Bortleson, G.C. and M.O. Fretwell. 1993. A review of possible causes of nutrient enrichment and decline of endangered sucker populations in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Portland, OR, United States Geological Survey. Water Resources Investigation Report 93-4087. 24p. Boyle, J.C. 1987. Fifty years on the Klamath. J. Shaw Historical Library 1(2): 17- 43. Bradbury, J.P., S.M. Colman, and R.L. Reynolds. 2004. The history of recent limnological changes and human impact on Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Journal of Paleolimnology 31: 151-165 Brown, L. R., P. B. Moyle, and R. M. Yoshiyama. 1994. Historical decline and current status of coho salmon in California. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 14: 23–261. Buehlar, D. A. 2000. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). In The Birds of North America, No. 506 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. Buettner, M. and G. Scoppettone. 1990. Life history and status of catostomids in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Completion Report. USFWS, National Fisheries Research Center, Reno Field Station, Nevada. Buettner, M. and C. Scoppettone. 1991. Distribution and information on the taxonomic status of the Shortnose sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris, and Lost River sucker, Deltistes luxatus, in the Klamath River Basin, California. Completion report. CDFG Contract FC-8304. USFWS, Seattle National Fishery Research Center, Reno Substation, Nevada. 101 p. Bureau of Land Management see U.S. Bureau of Land Management 307
Klamath Project Operations Biological Assessment Literature Cited: Conservation Measures Bureau of Reclamation. 1994. Klamath Project. Biological assessment on longterm operations of the Klamath Project, with speccial emphasis on Clear Lake operations. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 1998 (Water Use). Klamath Project Historical Water Use Analysis, Klamath County, Oregon and Siskiyou count, California. Review Draft. October 1998. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 1998 (Sucker Salvage). Klamath Project sucker salvage report – 1997. Unpublished report. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Klamath Falls, Oregon. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2000 (Water Quality). Analysis of Tule Lake water quality and sucker telemetry, 1992-1995. Unpublished report. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Klamath Falls, Oregon. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2000 (Sucker Salvage). Klamath Irrigation project sucker salvage and Langell Valley fish survey report – 1999. Unpublished report. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Klamath Falls, Oregon. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2001. Biological Assessment of Klamath Project’s continuing operations on the endangered Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker. February 2001. Klamath Falls, Oregon. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2002. Final Biological Assessment: the effects of proposed actions related to Klamath Project operation (April 1, 2002 – March 31, 2012) on federally-listed threatened and endangered species. February 2002. Klamath Falls, Oregon. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2003. Chiloquin Dam fish passage appraisal study, project 1989, Klamath River basin, Oregon. Klamath Falls, Oregon. Burnett, K.M. 2001. Relationships among juvenile anadromous salmonids, their freshwater habitat, and landscape characteristics over multiple years and spatial scales in the Elk River, Oregon. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. Burnett, K. M., G. H. Reeves, D. Miller, S. E. Clarke, K. C. Christiansen, and K. Vance-Borland. 2003. A first step toward broad scale identification of freshwater protected areas for Pacific salmon and trout. Pages 144-154 In J. Beumer, A. Grant, and D.C. Smith (eds.) Aquatic Protected Areas: what works best and how do we know? Proceedings of the World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, 308
Page 1 and 2:
Biological Assessment The Effects o
Page 3:
Biological Assessment The Effects o
Page 7 and 8:
Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This biological a
Page 22 and 23:
Part 1 INTRODUCTION, ACTION AREA, A
Page 24:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 56 and 57:
Part 2 ENDANGERED SUCKERS Sucker De
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Table 2-7. Upper Klamath Basin Nutr
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Part 3 COHO SALMON Information abou
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Environmental Baseline Klamath Proj
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
T&C 5 T&C 6 T&C 7 T&C 8 Fund instre
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283: Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 306: Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 312 and 313: Description Part 5 BALD EAGLES A la
Page 314 and 315: Figure 5-1. Bald Eagle range in Nor
Page 322 and 323: Part 7 CONSULTATION HISTORY Section
Page 330 and 331: Part 9 LITERATURE CITED Agrawal, A.
Page 356 and 357: Accomplishment Report, Winter 2007.
show all

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?