22.03.2014 Views

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Klamath</strong> Project Operations <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Introduction, Action Area, and Proposed Action: Detailed Proposed Action<br />

Modeling Assumptions:<br />

(1) Minimum IGD flows are as indicated in the Proposed Project.<br />

(2) Minimum UKL elevations are as indicated in the Proposed Project.<br />

(3) Priorities are river, lake, Project from April through September.<br />

(4) Lake level refill targets are as indicated in the Proposed Project.<br />

(5) D<strong>is</strong>tribution of a portion of storable inflow to the river, October through<br />

February, after monthly UKL refill targets are achieved.<br />

(6) D<strong>is</strong>tribution of a portion of the April-September surplus to the river in May –<br />

September, varying the percentage of the surplus depending on the seasonal<br />

supply, i.e., 35% in wetter years, 25% in median years, and 10% in drier<br />

years. The actual percentage varied linearly with the water supply. The<br />

d<strong>is</strong>tribution was: May 1-15 15%, May 16-31 15%, June 1-15 20%, June 16-<br />

30 20%, July 1-15 7.5%, July 16-31 7.5% and September 10%. Th<strong>is</strong><br />

d<strong>is</strong>tribution was used in the modeling in an attempt simulate how the IM<br />

process might be used to d<strong>is</strong>tribute available water.<br />

It should be noted that WRIMS has the luxury of going back in time and using<br />

actual h<strong>is</strong>torical UKL, LRDC and KSD inflows to adjust monthly d<strong>is</strong>tributions for<br />

river flows and lake levels. Specific replication of these scenarios today would be<br />

somewhat limited by the unpredictable future of the inflows l<strong>is</strong>ted above as well<br />

as a number of other factors including; precipitation, snow pack and soil mo<strong>is</strong>ture<br />

content, temperature, etc. Operations in the future would attempt to achieve<br />

similar results using the IM process described in the BA.<br />

The following exceedence tables reflect the estimated frequency that different<br />

lake levels and river flows might be realized under the Proposed Action using<br />

h<strong>is</strong>torical inflow data (Tables 1-5 and 1-6). For compar<strong>is</strong>on purposes only,<br />

Appendix 3-D contains similar tables illustrating modeled exceedence flows using<br />

the NRCS April 1st forecast rather than the known h<strong>is</strong>torical inflows.<br />

Note: Monthly exceedence flows will not always occur sequentially.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!