22.03.2014 Views

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Klamath</strong> Project Operations <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Endangered Suckers: Sucker Description, Life H<strong>is</strong>tory, Habitat, D<strong>is</strong>tribution, and<br />

Abundance<br />

immediately downstream of the US Highway 97 bridge, and in the Beatty Gap<br />

area of the upper Sprague River (Buettner and Scoppettone 1990, Tyler et al.<br />

2007, Ellsworth et al. 2007). Other areas in the Sprague River watershed where<br />

Lost River sucker spawning <strong>is</strong> suspected include the lower Sycan River and the<br />

Sprague River near Kamkaun Spring (Ellsworth et al. 2007).<br />

Presently, shortnose suckers from UKL spawn in the lower Williamson and<br />

Sprague rivers (Buettner and Scoppettone 1990), principally below Chiloquin<br />

Dam (Tyler et al. 2007, Ellsworth et al. 2007). The few adult shortnose suckers<br />

captured at the shoreline spawning areas in UKL indicate that some shortnose<br />

sucker spawning <strong>is</strong> likely to still occur at the shoreline spawning areas (Hayes et<br />

al. 2002, 2004, Barry et al. 2007 UKL). Although species identification <strong>is</strong> not<br />

apparent, sucker spawning <strong>is</strong> also suspected in the Wood River. Whereas it <strong>is</strong><br />

possible that sucker spawning may occur in other small tributaries to UKL and its<br />

main tributaries, f<strong>is</strong>heries investigations have not identified sucker populations in<br />

tributaries other than the Williamson, Sprague, and Wood rivers.<br />

Since l<strong>is</strong>ting, information on relative abundance of adult sucker populations has<br />

been obtained from the number of captured suckers migrating up the Williamson<br />

River each spring to spawn (USFWS 2002). The Williamson River spawning<br />

abundance index, based on actual and interpolated catch per unit effort (CPUE)<br />

data, shows a decline in abundance for both species during the three f<strong>is</strong>h die-offs<br />

in the mid-1990s and a hiatus in recruitment of <strong>new</strong> individuals from 1998 to<br />

1999 before the population began to increase in 2000 (Figure 2-3; Cunningham et<br />

al. 2002, Tyler et al. 2004). The increase in the spawning abundance index that<br />

began in 2000 could represent the recruitment of a single dominant year class<br />

over a period of two years or the recruitment of two d<strong>is</strong>tinct year classes. If a<br />

single year class recruited in over two years during 2000 and 2001 it would likely<br />

be the 1991 year class for Lost River suckers and the 1993 year class for<br />

shortnose suckers (USFWS 2002).<br />

Since 2001, data from adult population monitoring in UKL has become robust<br />

enough to perform a capture-recapture analys<strong>is</strong> for shoreline spawning Lost River<br />

suckers that estimates the annual survivorship (Janney and Shively 2007, Janney<br />

et al. 2007). Furthermore, population assessment for UKL suckers can be<br />

understood by considering length frequency h<strong>is</strong>tograms and population change<br />

estimates as provided in Janney and Shively (2007) and Janney et al. (2007).<br />

Length Frequency<br />

Recent analys<strong>is</strong> of sucker population data corroborates the assessment in<br />

Scoppottone and Vinyard (1991) at the time of l<strong>is</strong>ting that the population of Lost<br />

River suckers in UKL was dominated by older individuals and showed no<br />

evidence of substantial recruitment during the 1980s and early 1990s (Janney and<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!