Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Klamath Project Operations Biological Assessment Literature Cited: Conservation Measures National Research Council (NRC). 2004. Endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River Basin: causes of decline and strategies for recovery. National Academies Press. Washington, D.C. 397p. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (NCRWQCB). 1998. Transmittal letter for Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Waterbodies for California’s North Coast Region. January 14, 1998. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ). 1998. Oregon’s final water quality limited streams - 303(d) list. Oregon Depart of Environmental Quality, Portland. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ). 2002. Upper Klamath Lake drainage total maximum daily load and water quality management plan. 188 p. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center (ORNHIC). 2007. Astragalus applegatei (Applegate’s milk-vetch) relocation and status summary for 2007. Draft unpublished report submitted to Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office. Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) 2003. Review of 2002 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, Published February 2007 Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384. Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) 2004. Review of 2003 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, Published February 2007 Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384. Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) 2005. Review of 2004 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, Published February 2007 Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384. Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) 2006. Review of 2005 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, Published February 2007 Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384. Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) 2007. Review of 2006 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, Published February 2007 Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384. PacifiCorp. 1997. Final report of fish trapping activities at Klamath hydroelectric project. Prepared by PacifiCorp Environmental Services. June 1997. Parrish, R. 2007 (draft). 2006 Screwtrap monitoring report. USFWS, Klamath Basin Ecosystem Restoration Office. 5p. 323
Klamath Project Operations Biological Assessment Literature Cited: Conservation Measures Peck, B. 2000. Radio telemetry studies of adult Shortnose and Lost River suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and tributaries, Oregon. Unpublished report. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Klamath Falls, Oregon. 18 p. Perdue, E.M., Lytle, C.R., and M.S. Sweet. 1981. The chemical and biological impact of Klamath Marsh on the Williamson River, Oregon: Project A-047-ORE. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, Water Resources Research Institute, WRRI-71. Perkins, D.L. and G.G. Scoppettone. 1996. Spawning and migration of Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) and Shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) in the Clear Lake drainage, Modoc County, California. National Biological Service, California Science Center, Reno Field Station, Reno, Nevada. 52 p. Perkins, D.L., G.G. Scoppettone, and M. Buettner. 2000 Biology. Reproductive biology and demographics of endangered Lost River and shortnose suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Report to the Bureau of Reclamation. October 2000. 40p. Perkins, D.L., J. Kann, and G.G. Scoppettone. 2000 Water Quality. The role of poor water quality and fish kills in the decline of endangered Lost River and Shortnose suckers in Upper Klamath Lake. Final report. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Research Center, Reno Field Station, Reno, Nevada. Phinney, H.K., C.A. Peek, and J.L. McLachlan. 1959. A survey of the phytoplankton problems in Klamath Lake: Report to the supporting agencies. Oregon State University, Department of Botany, Corvallis, Oregon. 52 p. Piaskowski, R. and M. Buettner. 2003. Review of Water Quality and Fisheries Sampling Conducted in Gerber Reservoir, Oregon with Emphasis on the Shortnose Sucker and its Habitat Needs. Bureau of Reclamation. 90 p. Powers, K., B Baldwin, E. Buck, and B. Cody, 2005. Klamath River Basin Issues and Activities: An Overview, dated September 22, 2005. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. 39 pages. Available at Quigley, D. 2005. Scott River watershed adult coho spawning ground surveys: November 2004 – January 2005. Report prepared for USFWS and CDFG by the Siskiyou RCD. 148 pp. Reclamation See Bureau of Reclamation 324
Page 1 and 2:
Biological Assessment The Effects o
Page 3:
Biological Assessment The Effects o
Page 7 and 8:
Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This biological a
Page 22 and 23:
Part 1 INTRODUCTION, ACTION AREA, A
Page 24:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 56 and 57:
Part 2 ENDANGERED SUCKERS Sucker De
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Table 2-7. Upper Klamath Basin Nutr
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Part 3 COHO SALMON Information abou
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Environmental Baseline Klamath Proj
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
T&C 5 T&C 6 T&C 7 T&C 8 Fund instre
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299: Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 306: Klamath Project Operations Biologic
Page 312 and 313: Description Part 5 BALD EAGLES A la
Page 314 and 315: Figure 5-1. Bald Eagle range in Nor
Page 322 and 323: Part 7 CONSULTATION HISTORY Section
Page 330 and 331: Part 9 LITERATURE CITED Agrawal, A.
Page 356 and 357: Accomplishment Report, Winter 2007.
show all

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?