22.03.2014 Views

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

Our new Biological Assessment is out - Klamath Basin Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Klamath</strong> Project Operations <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Coho Salmon: Proposed Action<br />

term flow targets: July through September, pages 67 to 68, NMFS 2002 BO).<br />

Additionally, NMFS concluded that flows in the vicinity of 1000 cfs are not<br />

expected to increase temperatures and would have the benefit of dampening the<br />

magnitude of diurnal fluctuations in temperature (as d<strong>is</strong>cussed in next sub-section<br />

– Temperature). At th<strong>is</strong> time, Reclamation proposes no changes to the<br />

recommended long-term minimum flows as <strong>out</strong>lined in NMFS 2002 BO for the<br />

July through September period.<br />

On page 56 of the 2002 BO, NMFS states “[g]iven that coho [salmon] are<br />

primarily tributary spawners, that main stem spawning and rearing habitat <strong>is</strong><br />

likely not limiting at the current population size, and recognizing the importance<br />

of the main stem as a migratory corridor for adult and down-stream migrating<br />

smolts, NMFS thinks that the approach contained in th<strong>is</strong> [2002 BO] sufficiently<br />

addresses the adverse effects of the <strong>Klamath</strong> Project to SONC coho salmon<br />

[ESU]...”. Further, the 2002 BO states that “[c]oho salmon typically rear in fresh<br />

water for up to 15 months, then migrate to the sea as smolts between March and<br />

June” (p. 12, NMFS 2002 BO). Similar to the conclusion in the NMFS 2002 BO,<br />

Reclamation recognizes the importance of the March through June period in the<br />

coho salmon life cycle within the main stem of the upper <strong>Klamath</strong> River.<br />

In regards to the time period of March through June, under the Proposed Action,<br />

Reclamation will retain the NMFS 2002 BO’s recommended long-term minimum<br />

flows for a dry year water type for releases from IGD 29 . However, unlike the<br />

NMFS 2002 BO, Reclamation proposes to not go below these minimum monthly<br />

flow levels for all water year types. Th<strong>is</strong> would be a deviation from the NMFS<br />

2002 BO, which establ<strong>is</strong>hed minimum flows by year type.<br />

The rationale for these minimums and their impact on ESA-l<strong>is</strong>ted coho salmon<br />

will be d<strong>is</strong>cussed below. The long-term minimum flows for a dry year type were<br />

establ<strong>is</strong>hed in NMFS 2002 and were based on salmon fry habitat suitability<br />

curves utilizing estimated unimpaired flows (see Section 11.4.2 – Rationale for<br />

long-term flow targets: March through June, pages 63 to 67, NMFS 2002 BO).<br />

In most years, Reclamation anticipates operating above the cumulative monthly<br />

minimum flows. The following exceedence table reflects the estimated frequency<br />

of IGD flows that might be realized under the Proposed Action (Table 3-17).<br />

29<br />

Dry year water type releases: March 1,450 cfs; April 1,500 cfs; May 1,500 cfs; and<br />

June 1,400 cfs.<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!