A Gallup Poll showing that only 1% of the people had ever heard of UNESCO is not depressing. It means that hardly anybody has been turned against it! How many people can name the five most important committees in the U.S. Senate? How many can name all the countries in Central and South America? How many persons know the official name of the Marshall plan? <strong>The</strong> important question is, how many persons will be affected by UNESCO, whether they know it or not, and in what ways? . . . UNESCO is a part of the fundamental law of 40 nations; as such, it need not be on the defensive. Clearly, the 40 member states are themselves on the defensive. 11 In spite of this continuous bombardment on the subconscious thinking of Americans for almost two decades, the number of people who are beginning to question the UN continues to grow. So much so, in fact, that by June of 1963 the master planners were beginning to worry. <strong>The</strong> National Advertising Council publicly announced on June 24 that it had been called in to help resell the UN to the American people because, as it put it, "<strong>The</strong> United Nations is considered by close observers . . . to have lost some of its grip on public opinion." 12 With the help of a Madison Avenue advertising firm, the National Advertising Council launched a gigantic campaign in the press, radio and TV valued at over five million dollars! As you may recall, the gimmick that was used as the main theme for this campaign was a picture of a huge and frightening mushroom cloud of an H-bomb explosion. And after thus sending a calculated chill down our spines at the thought of nuclear holocaust, the advertising experts then flashed the words: "This Is One Alternative To <strong>The</strong> United Nations!" Now really, who are the "fright peddlers"? NOTES 1. Mike Newberry, "Birchers Take Warpath Against UN Peace Hopes," the Worker (January 21, 1962), p. 6. 2. 46 Angry Men, p. 84. 3. United Nations Guardian of Peace, Department of State publication #7225 (September 1961), p. 36. 4. Speech by George Todt before the Congress of Freedom, Veterans War Memorial Auditorium (San Francisco, April 1955). 5. "Anti-UNESCO," Los Angeles Times (March 2, 1955). Also, "Boy Supported," Los Angeles Times (March 7, 1955). Also, "Speech Freedom," Los Angeles Times (March 11, 1955). 6. Daily Worker (October 28, 1953), P. 6. 7. Congressman James Utt, "Power Shift in the United Nations," Congressional Record (April 11, 1962). 8. United Nations General Assembly Yearbook, 1946-1947, annex 12, general records, 6th commission, p. 226. Also, Eleanor Roosevelt and William DeWitt, <strong>The</strong> United Nations
Today and Tomorrow (New York, Harper and Brothers, 1953), p. 153. Also, <strong>The</strong> Strange Origin of the UN Flag (Box 2037, Fullerton, Calif., Education Information, Inc.), p. 2. 9. Florence Fowler Lyons, Reports on UNESCO, syndicated column (October 28, 1962). 10. U.S. Committee for UNICEF bulletin (November 5, 1959). 11. UNESCO Leaders Speak, Department of State publication #841574 (1949), p. 4. 12. "Campaign Will Sell UN by Advertising," Chicago Tribune (June 25,1963).
- Page 1 and 2:
CONTENTS PREFACE FOREWORD PART I -
- Page 3 and 4:
FOREWORD On April 24, 1955, the Com
- Page 5 and 6:
PART I KATANGA A Case History Regre
- Page 7 and 8:
half of his face and skull. A few s
- Page 9 and 10:
If the Congo does go Communist, it
- Page 11 and 12:
Lumumba was actually in support of
- Page 13 and 14:
It did not take very long. A few da
- Page 15 and 16:
chaos to justify the harsh police-s
- Page 17 and 18:
NOTES 1. For background see Congres
- Page 19 and 20:
Letter to Patrice Lumumba Whenever
- Page 21 and 22:
and protested to Hammarskjold that
- Page 23 and 24:
And on the word politique his brown
- Page 25 and 26:
e kept in mind. The most important
- Page 27 and 28:
We know only too well that UN force
- Page 29 and 30:
Here was a giant step toward unity
- Page 31 and 32:
the late Dag Hammarskjold. The Mosc
- Page 33 and 34:
12. Lessing, p. 143. 13. Senator Th
- Page 35 and 36:
The contradictions and equivocation
- Page 37 and 38:
would send down a commissaire d’e
- Page 39 and 40:
the home of a Dr. and Mrs. Szeles,
- Page 41 and 42:
week after the United Nations had l
- Page 43 and 44:
21. In addition to news reporters,
- Page 45 and 46:
What kind of troops were these that
- Page 47 and 48:
lind "killing and wounding--even in
- Page 49 and 50:
6. Hempstone, pp. 178-179. 7. Senat
- Page 51 and 52:
PART II THE MASTER PLANNERS Communi
- Page 53 and 54:
Dictatorship can be established onl
- Page 55 and 56:
In confirmation of Cvetic's testimo
- Page 57 and 58:
Commerce, the Farm Bureau, and the
- Page 59 and 60:
Let none but Americans stand guard
- Page 61 and 62:
should win. Much of this was implic
- Page 63 and 64:
lesser posts within the United Nati
- Page 65 and 66:
13. Hearings before the House Commi
- Page 67 and 68:
Roosevelt had been inclined to prot
- Page 69 and 70: Virginius Frank Coe: Coe was anothe
- Page 71 and 72: Subversion in Government Department
- Page 73 and 74: It takes the better part of a day t
- Page 75 and 76: employees loyalty board to hold hea
- Page 77 and 78: Jessup served as assistant secretar
- Page 79 and 80: 26. Activities of U.S. Citizens Emp
- Page 81 and 82: the European center of nuclear rese
- Page 83 and 84: delegation upon hearing of my withd
- Page 85 and 86: Hungarian Freedom Fighters, was off
- Page 87 and 88: United States for resuming nuclear
- Page 89 and 90: NOTES 1. United Nations Guardian of
- Page 91 and 92: PART III PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE Unit
- Page 93 and 94: the name of the committee of public
- Page 95 and 96: security through governmental inter
- Page 97 and 98: principle, a public statement of ge
- Page 99 and 100: Since the United Nations claims tha
- Page 101 and 102: examination to define "fundamental
- Page 103 and 104: the Marxian point of view. . . . Th
- Page 105 and 106: peaceful solution to the conflicts
- Page 107 and 108: Touching on the subject of teaching
- Page 109 and 110: [Correct answer: "man-made."] Quest
- Page 111 and 112: possible with as little investment
- Page 113 and 114: 11. Reuter's dispatch datelined Sep
- Page 115 and 116: was the man who introduced legislat
- Page 117 and 118: "mental case" with no formal charge
- Page 119: ever reaches the point where it is
- Page 123 and 124: This, of course, is exactly what ha
- Page 125 and 126: Washington. These bridges still sta
- Page 127 and 128: Secretly directing the anti-Communi
- Page 129 and 130: On November 12, 1951, General Matth
- Page 131 and 132: 7. Department of State Bulletin (De
- Page 133 and 134: Shall we acquire the means of effec
- Page 135 and 136: India or Communist Poland, and thes
- Page 137 and 138: This concept of limited government
- Page 139 and 140: do a thing like that? And how many
- Page 141 and 142: 18. As quoted by Clarence Manion, "
- Page 143 and 144: All of this, of course, was no mere
- Page 145 and 146: fund would need five billion dollar
- Page 147 and 148: from an executive agreement, a high
- Page 149 and 150: 8. J. B. Matthews, "The World Healt
- Page 151 and 152: capacity to feed and support their
- Page 153 and 154: 5. Invite five thousand Soviet "tou
- Page 155 and 156: Commenting on President Kennedy’s
- Page 157 and 158: It is a legitimate American nationa
- Page 159 and 160: For years, the master planners have
- Page 161 and 162: We shall nobly save or meanly lose
- Page 163 and 164: somehow prevent those units from wa
- Page 165 and 166: the following question: "Would it b
- Page 167 and 168: When the UN finally topples, it wil
- Page 169 and 170: complains about being subject to "a
- Page 171:
G. Edward Griffin G. Edward Griffin