17.04.2014 Views

G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive

G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive

G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Spanish. <strong>The</strong>y practice medicine in the Congo, not for profit, but for the benefit of the<br />

underdeveloped populations. <strong>The</strong> political questions did not concern them. Being doctors,<br />

they had no position to take regarding matters which they felt were solely the responsibility<br />

of the Katangese government and UN authorities. What was their concern, however, was<br />

the health and well-being of the population in their care. <strong>The</strong> prevention of wounds was of<br />

equal concern to them as the prevention of sickness. Consequently, they were well within<br />

their role of physicians when they issued their protest and declared: "It is not as active<br />

partisans of an independent Katanga that the civilian doctors of Elisabethville have<br />

thought it their duty to warn the world conscience, but strictly as citizens of the world,<br />

besides being bound by the Hippocratic oath which compels them to fight against death<br />

wherever it may come from."<br />

3. After teaching at City College and the University of Minnesota, Professor Ernest van<br />

den Haag became (and still is) a member of the faculty of New York University and the<br />

New School for Social Research. He lectures widely and is the author of Education as an<br />

Industry and of <strong>The</strong> Fabric of Society (with Ralph Ross), the latter a widely used textbook<br />

in the social sciences. He has published many articles in American and foreign learned<br />

journals. Professor van den Haag is a fellow of the American Sociological Association and<br />

of the Royal Economic Society.<br />

4. In the original source material, the nationality of the particular soldiers involved was<br />

given. It would seem unfair, however, to implicate a whole nationality when the soldiers<br />

were completely subject to UN directives. <strong>The</strong> United Nations has never apologized for<br />

the action of these men or implied that it was not responsible for their acts. In fact, it has<br />

widely praised their performance. It will be our practice, therefore, to substitute the name<br />

United Nations for all future references to troops of specific nationalities serving under UN<br />

command.<br />

5. Ernest van den Haag, <strong>The</strong> War in Katanga (New York, American Committee for Aid to<br />

Katanga Freedom Fighters, 1962), p. 11.<br />

6. 46 Angry Men, pp. 27-29.<br />

7. Hempstone, pp. 221-222. For Williams' statement see "Those Angelic UN Soldiers,"<br />

Chicago Tribune (December 28, 1961).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!