G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7. Hempstone, p. 242. 8. UN document S/4426. 9. As quoted by Hempstone, p. 242. 10. Senator Thomas Dodd, Congressional Record (August 3, 1962). 11. Senator Thomas Dodd, Congressional Record (September 8 and 16, 1961). Also, Department of State Bulletin (December 12, 1960), p. 908. 12. Hempstone, pp. 113-114. 13. O'Brien, p. 58. 14. Ibid., p. 189. 15. Allen P. Merriam, Congo: Background of Conflict (Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press, 1961), p. 240. 16. Schuyler, p. 234. 17. Senator Thomas Dodd, Congressional Record (August 3, 1962). Also, Schuyler, pp. 233-234. 18. Philippa Schuyler, Who Killed the Congo? (New York, The Devin-Adair Company, 1962), p. 260. 19. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee as quoted in the Tidings (Los Angeles, August 16, 1963), p. 2. 20. Bare Red Plot by Lumumba," Chicago Tribune (November, 2, 1960). 21. O'Brien, p. 96. 22. Philippa Schuyler, Who Killed the Congo? (New York, The Devin-Adair Company, 1962), pp. 233-235. 23. Ibid., p. 235. 24. Hempstone, pp. 126, 130.
We know only too well that UN forces would bring Lumumba's agents with them. Godefroi Munongo, August 4, 1960 CHAPTER FOUR: THE MODERATES For many years the United States has been financing and supporting the expansion of international Communism around the world through measures which have been presented to the American people as ways of fighting Communism. Foreign aid is probably the most obvious example. President after president has told us that we have to send billions to various Communist and pro-Communist countries in order to win them away from Soviet domination. We have shipped them military equipment, trained their officers in our military schools, sent them machine tools, built whole factories and power dams for them, and sold them subsidized wheat. Our political leaders have shrewdly borrowed the required money from our children and grandchildren who will be saddled with these debts for many generations to come. The record is truly fantastic. But the most incredible part of all is that this whole operation, which has been so necessary for Communist success, has been sold to Americans as a way of opposing Communism. A glance at a few issues of the People's World or the Worker or other Communist periodicals will cause even the skeptical to realize that our foreign aid is very near and dear to the hearts of Communists everywhere. The only criticism one finds of our foreign aid program in the Communist press is that it isn't as large and doesn't grow as fast as the Communists want. One of the prime reasons they advocate foreign aid even to countries that are not yet totally Communist but are merely in the socialist (or transitional) phase, is that it helps to destroy private enterprise and strengthen socialism within these countries. The money must never be allowed to be used to develop private industry. It must be used only for government projects. For instance, back in 1955 when the Communist party of India formally announced its support of Nehru, the Communist Daily Worker carried a description of the event. Toward the end of the article it quoted Ajoy Ghosh, general secretary of the Communist party in India, as saving: "We want foreign aid coming at a governmental level and not with a specific purpose." He further said Indians should be "free to use the aid for anything we want." 1 That, however, is another story. It is mentioned here merely to point up a recognizable pattern that has developed over the past few years regarding certain United States State Department policies. This pattern is involved with convincing the voters that a particular policy of the State Department or the United Nations is in the best interests of the United States when, in reality, it is just the opposite. There is no better illustration of this than the circumstances surrounding United Nations and Washington support of the so-called "moderate" central Government that emerged after Lumumba's death. To tell that part of the story, however, it is necessary to take a closer look at Antoine Gizenga. Gizenga was a minor personality in Congolese politics until he was invited to Prague, Czechoslovakia, for Communist cadre training. 2 When he returned, he became one of Lumumba's strongest supporters and worked closely with him to implement plans for the Communist take-over of the whole Congo. When Lumumba was arrested and then killed, Gizenga set himself up as Lumumba's successor. He established a Communist regime in the neighboring province of Orientale and gathered all of Lumumba's followers around him. The Soviet and Czechoslovakian diplomats and consular officials who were kicked out of Leopoldville by Colonel Mobutu popped up in the Gizenga stronghold of Stanleyville
Page 1 and 2: CONTENTS PREFACE FOREWORD PART I -
Page 3 and 4: FOREWORD On April 24, 1955, the Com
Page 5 and 6: PART I KATANGA A Case History Regre
Page 7 and 8: half of his face and skull. A few s
Page 9 and 10: If the Congo does go Communist, it
Page 11 and 12: Lumumba was actually in support of
Page 13 and 14: It did not take very long. A few da
Page 15 and 16: chaos to justify the harsh police-s
Page 17 and 18: NOTES 1. For background see Congres
Page 19 and 20: Letter to Patrice Lumumba Whenever
Page 21 and 22: and protested to Hammarskjold that
Page 23 and 24: And on the word politique his brown
Page 25: e kept in mind. The most important
Page 29 and 30: Here was a giant step toward unity
Page 31 and 32: the late Dag Hammarskjold. The Mosc
Page 33 and 34: 12. Lessing, p. 143. 13. Senator Th
Page 35 and 36: The contradictions and equivocation
Page 37 and 38: would send down a commissaire d’e
Page 39 and 40: the home of a Dr. and Mrs. Szeles,
Page 41 and 42: week after the United Nations had l
Page 43 and 44: 21. In addition to news reporters,
Page 45 and 46: What kind of troops were these that
Page 47 and 48: lind "killing and wounding--even in
Page 49 and 50: 6. Hempstone, pp. 178-179. 7. Senat
Page 51 and 52: PART II THE MASTER PLANNERS Communi
Page 53 and 54: Dictatorship can be established onl
Page 55 and 56: In confirmation of Cvetic's testimo
Page 57 and 58: Commerce, the Farm Bureau, and the
Page 59 and 60: Let none but Americans stand guard
Page 61 and 62: should win. Much of this was implic
Page 63 and 64: lesser posts within the United Nati
Page 65 and 66: 13. Hearings before the House Commi
Page 67 and 68: Roosevelt had been inclined to prot
Page 69 and 70: Virginius Frank Coe: Coe was anothe
Page 71 and 72: Subversion in Government Department
Page 73 and 74: It takes the better part of a day t
Page 75 and 76: employees loyalty board to hold hea
Page 77 and 78:
Jessup served as assistant secretar
Page 79 and 80:
26. Activities of U.S. Citizens Emp
Page 81 and 82:
the European center of nuclear rese
Page 83 and 84:
delegation upon hearing of my withd
Page 85 and 86:
Hungarian Freedom Fighters, was off
Page 87 and 88:
United States for resuming nuclear
Page 89 and 90:
NOTES 1. United Nations Guardian of
Page 91 and 92:
PART III PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE Unit
Page 93 and 94:
the name of the committee of public
Page 95 and 96:
security through governmental inter
Page 97 and 98:
principle, a public statement of ge
Page 99 and 100:
Since the United Nations claims tha
Page 101 and 102:
examination to define "fundamental
Page 103 and 104:
the Marxian point of view. . . . Th
Page 105 and 106:
peaceful solution to the conflicts
Page 107 and 108:
Touching on the subject of teaching
Page 109 and 110:
[Correct answer: "man-made."] Quest
Page 111 and 112:
possible with as little investment
Page 113 and 114:
11. Reuter's dispatch datelined Sep
Page 115 and 116:
was the man who introduced legislat
Page 117 and 118:
"mental case" with no formal charge
Page 119 and 120:
ever reaches the point where it is
Page 121 and 122:
Today and Tomorrow (New York, Harpe
Page 123 and 124:
This, of course, is exactly what ha
Page 125 and 126:
Washington. These bridges still sta
Page 127 and 128:
Secretly directing the anti-Communi
Page 129 and 130:
On November 12, 1951, General Matth
Page 131 and 132:
7. Department of State Bulletin (De
Page 133 and 134:
Shall we acquire the means of effec
Page 135 and 136:
India or Communist Poland, and thes
Page 137 and 138:
This concept of limited government
Page 139 and 140:
do a thing like that? And how many
Page 141 and 142:
18. As quoted by Clarence Manion, "
Page 143 and 144:
All of this, of course, was no mere
Page 145 and 146:
fund would need five billion dollar
Page 147 and 148:
from an executive agreement, a high
Page 149 and 150:
8. J. B. Matthews, "The World Healt
Page 151 and 152:
capacity to feed and support their
Page 153 and 154:
5. Invite five thousand Soviet "tou
Page 155 and 156:
Commenting on President Kennedy’s
Page 157 and 158:
It is a legitimate American nationa
Page 159 and 160:
For years, the master planners have
Page 161 and 162:
We shall nobly save or meanly lose
Page 163 and 164:
somehow prevent those units from wa
Page 165 and 166:
the following question: "Would it b
Page 167 and 168:
When the UN finally topples, it wil
Page 169 and 170:
complains about being subject to "a
Page 171:
G. Edward Griffin G. Edward Griffin
show all

G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?