G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive
G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive
G. Edward Griffin - The Fearful Master - PDF Archive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
create the public impression that they were not getting their way, they never even<br />
bothered to introduce a formal proposal for their troika in either the Security Council or the<br />
General Assembly. It was all for propaganda value, nothing more. 27<br />
<strong>The</strong>se, then, are the non-Communists that Mr. Stevenson says keep the United Nations<br />
out of Communist hands; the "citizens of the world" who place loyalty to every nation<br />
above loyalty to their own native land; the neutral men who spend their lives advocating<br />
Communist causes.<br />
Several years ago, Mr. Joseph Z. Kornfeder, a former member of the Communist party,<br />
summarized all that we have been trying to demonstrate in this section of the book. His<br />
words deserve serious consideration by all Americans:<br />
Now, as to the United Nations. If you were, let's say. a building<br />
engineer, and someone were to show you a set of blueprints about a<br />
certain building, you would know from those blueprints how that building<br />
was going to look. Organization "blueprints" can be read the same way.<br />
I need not be a member of the United Nations Secretariat to know that<br />
the UN "blueprint" is a Communist one. I was at the Moscow<br />
headquarters of the world Communist party for nearly three years and<br />
was acquainted with most of the top leaders, and, of course, I was also<br />
a leading party worker. I went to their colleges; I learned their pattern of<br />
operations, and if I see that pattern in effect anywhere, I can recognize<br />
it.<br />
<strong>The</strong> UN idea was sold to us on the basis that a setup of that sort was<br />
needed to keep the peace in this world. Nothing was said about the UN<br />
being a world Government in the making. I need waste no time about<br />
the UN peace-keeping qualities. With an aggressive Communist world<br />
empire on the loose and sitting right inside the UN, that idea was<br />
definitely unrealistic in the first place; unrealistic and disastrous as many<br />
of the New Deal's foreign policies.<br />
From the point of view of its master designers meeting at Dumbarton<br />
Oaks and Bretton Woods, and which included such masterful agents as<br />
Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie, and others, the UN<br />
was, and is, not a failure. <strong>The</strong>y and the Kremlin masterminds behind<br />
them never intended the UN as a peace-keeping organization. What<br />
they had in mind was a fancy and colossal Trojan horse under the wings<br />
of which their smaller agencies could more effectively operate. And in<br />
that they succeeded, even beyond their expectations. . . .<br />
<strong>The</strong> United Nations is the sole great survivor, the grand monument, as it<br />
were, to the greatest folly of all time; namely, the illegitimate marriage<br />
between the New Deal and Communism. Its internal setup, Communist<br />
designed, is a pattern for sociological conquest; a pattern aimed to<br />
serve the purpose of Communist penetration of the West. It is ingenious<br />
and deceptive. 28