30.04.2014 Views

July (pdf) - New York Power Authority

July (pdf) - New York Power Authority

July (pdf) - New York Power Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the costs of such pending claims, or additional similar claims which may arise in the future, it does not<br />

believe that such claims individually or in the aggregate will materially adversely affect its financial position.<br />

(d) State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit<br />

A renewed <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (‘‘SPDES’’) permit was issued for<br />

the <strong>Authority</strong>’s Blenheim-Gilboa Project in October 2002. This permit renewed the previously issued permits<br />

for the plant, including certain provisions of the permit that the <strong>Authority</strong> requested be eliminated as a<br />

permit condition. Particularly, the <strong>Authority</strong> had objected to a requirement that it file an application for a<br />

SPDES permit for the discharge from the plant’s upper reservoir to its lower reservoir on the ground that<br />

the plant’s Federal license obviated the need for such a permit. Subject to further administrative or judicial<br />

review, should the <strong>Authority</strong>’s objection be finally denied, such circumstances could adversely impact<br />

operation of the facility by subjecting water flows at the plant to State regulation, which could affect power<br />

generation.<br />

(e) American Eel litigation in Canada<br />

In April 2007, a number of fishermen and fishing companies from Ontario, Canada, filed a lawsuit in<br />

Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Hydro Quebec, Ontario <strong>Power</strong> Generation, and the <strong>Authority</strong>.<br />

Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that hydroelectric facilities, including the St. Lawrence-FDR Project,<br />

have caused a decline in the American Eel population which has unreasonably interfered with plaintiffs’<br />

fishing licenses. In 2004, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources reduced the quota for American Eel<br />

fishing to zero. The lawsuit seeks $5 million in damages plus certain interest, costs, and taxes. Hydro Quebec<br />

has accepted service of the complaint, is defending the action, and has filed a demand for particulars. The<br />

<strong>Authority</strong> is represented by Canadian counsel in the matter but has not been served with the complaint.<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

Actions or claims against the <strong>Authority</strong> are pending for the taking of property in connection with its<br />

projects, for negligence, for personal injury (including asbestos-related injuries) for environmental<br />

matters, in contract and for other matters, all of which will in the opinion of the <strong>Authority</strong> be disposed of<br />

within the amounts of the <strong>Authority</strong>’s insurance coverage, where applicable, or the amounts which the<br />

<strong>Authority</strong> has available therefore and without any material adverse effect on the business of the <strong>Authority</strong>.<br />

App. D-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!