rp21 situational analysis - Pacific Health Voices
rp21 situational analysis - Pacific Health Voices
rp21 situational analysis - Pacific Health Voices
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.6 Regional networks and<br />
responses<br />
International treaties<br />
The 29th South <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum called for the<br />
early ratification and implementation of the<br />
United Nations conventions related to drug<br />
control. 96 The international conventions on<br />
narcotics control include: the Convention<br />
on Narcotic Drugs 1961; the Convention<br />
on Psychotropic Substances 1971; and the<br />
Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic<br />
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances<br />
1988. Notably, the countries included in<br />
this <strong>analysis</strong>, with the exceptions of Tokelau<br />
97 and Timor-Leste, have signed up to the<br />
United Nations Framework Convention on<br />
Tobacco Control. 98 In contrast, at the time of<br />
writing, five countries included in this study<br />
are party to none of the UN conventions on<br />
drug control; and many of the others are<br />
party to only one of the three conventions. 99<br />
Fiji and Tonga are party to all three treaties.<br />
The Solomon Islands is a party to the<br />
1961 Convention, as is Papua New Guinea,<br />
which is in negotiations for adherence to<br />
the 1988 Convention. Since the 2004–05<br />
<strong>situational</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>, Samoa, the Cook Islands<br />
and Vanuatu have signed up to the 1988<br />
agreement. A detailed overview of the countries<br />
that have ratified each convention can<br />
be found at Appendix 18.3. Convention<br />
adherence is significant, as it has been suggested<br />
that the successful enforcement of<br />
regional environmental treaties related to<br />
fishing and other resources of import for the<br />
PICTs could provide a model for managing<br />
international crime, including drug trafficking<br />
and production. 100 However, from a<br />
governance perspective, there are many challenges<br />
for this approach and caution should<br />
be advocated when considering regionalist<br />
approaches to legislating for illegal activities.<br />
Legislation<br />
Much of the legislation against illicit drug<br />
cultivation, trafficking and related offences in<br />
the PICTs is ill-equipped to manage emerging<br />
issues and does not apply to new and<br />
emerging substances such as amphetaminetype<br />
stimulants. 101 The exception is in the<br />
American-affiliated states which have largely<br />
adopted the United States forms. Reported<br />
judgments from the PICTs indicate that courts<br />
currently exercise a degree of discretion in<br />
sentencing in relation to alcohol and illicit<br />
drug offences, an approach to be encouraged.<br />
Details of specific legislative approaches<br />
to alcohol and other drugs are included in<br />
19<br />
96 Forum Communique, 29th South <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, 24–25<br />
August 1998.<br />
97 Tokelau is covered under the New Zealand agreement.<br />
98 See Appendix 18.3.<br />
99 See Appendix 18.3.<br />
100 N. Boister (2005), New directions for regional cooperation in the suppression of transnational<br />
crime in the South <strong>Pacific</strong>, Journal of South <strong>Pacific</strong> Law, 9(2).<br />
101 UNODC, <strong>Pacific</strong> Profile, August 2003; N. Boister (2004), Regional cooperation in the suppression<br />
of transnational crime in the South <strong>Pacific</strong>: threat assessment by the <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum. Paper<br />
presented to International Law and Security in the Post-Iraq Era: Where to for International Law?<br />
Annual conference of the Australian and New Zealand Society of International Law, Canberra,<br />
June 2004.<br />
Regional overview