03.06.2014 Views

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

378 5th April<br />

2005<br />

Wall of New Barnet, B.<br />

Wallace of Saltaire, L.<br />

Walmsley, B.<br />

Walpole, L.<br />

Walton of Detchant, L.<br />

Warnock, B.<br />

Warwick of UndercliVe, B.<br />

Waverley, V.<br />

Wedderburn of Charlton, L.<br />

Weidenfeld, L.<br />

Whitaker, B.<br />

Whitty, L.<br />

Wilcox, B.<br />

Wilkins, B.<br />

Williams of Crosby, B.<br />

Williams of Elvel, L.<br />

Williamson of Horton, L.<br />

Windlesham, L.<br />

Winston, L.<br />

Wright of Richmond, L.<br />

Young of Norwood Green, L.<br />

PRAYERS were read by the Lord Bishop of Southwell.<br />

1. Barony of Aberdare in the Peerage of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>—The Petition of Alastair John<br />

Lyndhurst Bruce claiming to have succeeded to the Barony of Aberdare in the Peerage of the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> and praying that the Clerk of the <strong>Parliament</strong>s might be directed to enter the<br />

petitioner as the Lord Aberdare on his register of hereditary peers maintained under Standing<br />

Order 10(5) was presented and was referred to the Lord Chancellor to consider and report<br />

upon to the House pursuant to Standing Order 11.<br />

2. Barony of Boyle in the Peerage of Great Britain—The Petition of John (also known as Jonathan)<br />

Richard Boyle claiming to have succeeded to the Barony of Boyle in the Peerage of Great<br />

Britain and praying that the Clerk of the <strong>Parliament</strong>s might be directed to enter the petitioner<br />

as the Lord Boyle on his register of hereditary peers maintained under Standing Order 10(5)<br />

was presented and was referred to the Lord Chancellor to consider and report upon to the<br />

House pursuant to Standing Order 11.<br />

3. Barony of Mountgarret in the Peerage of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>—The Petition of Piers James<br />

Richard Butler claiming to have succeeded to the Barony of Mountgarret in the Peerage of<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> and praying that the Clerk of the <strong>Parliament</strong>s might be directed to enter<br />

the petitioner as the Lord Mountgarret on his register of hereditary peers maintained under<br />

Standing Order 10(5) was presented and was referred to the Lord Chancellor to consider and<br />

report upon to the House pursuant to Standing Order 11.<br />

4. Barony of Polwarth in the Peerage of Scotland—The Petition of Andrew Walter Hepburne Scott<br />

claiming to have succeeded to the Barony of Polwarth in the Peerage of Scotland and praying<br />

that the Clerk of the <strong>Parliament</strong>s might be directed to enter the petitioner as the Lord Polwarth<br />

on his register of hereditary peers maintained under Standing Order 10(5) was presented and<br />

was referred to the Lord Chancellor to consider and report upon to the House pursuant to<br />

Standing Order 11.<br />

Judicial Business<br />

5. Royle (Petitioner) v. Manchester City Football Club plc (Respondents)—The petition of Joe Royle<br />

praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.<br />

6. Walsh (AP) (Petitioner) v. Director of Assets Recovery Agency (Respondent) (Northern<br />

Ireland)—The petition of Cecil Walsh praying for leave to appeal notwithstanding that the<br />

time limited by Standing Order II has expired was presented and referred to an Appeal<br />

Committee. The petitioner’s legal aid certificate was lodged.<br />

7. Jackson and others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General (Respondent)—The petition<br />

of the League Against Cruel Sports Limited praying for leave to intervene in the said appeal<br />

was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.<br />

8. In re J (a child) (FC)—The appeal was set down for hearing and referred to an Appellate<br />

Committee (lodged 31st March).<br />

Papers<br />

9. Command Papers—The following papers were presented to the House by command of Her<br />

Majesty and ordered to lie on the Table:<br />

1. Foreign AVairs—Government Response to the Third Report of the House of Commons<br />

Foreign AVairs Committee on the Western Balkans; (6505)<br />

2. Defence—Departmental Minute concerning the Ministry of Defence’s intention to<br />

introduce a Service Group Life Insurance (SGLI) Scheme for the Armed Forces. (—)<br />

10. Negative Instruments—The following instruments were laid before the House and ordered to lie<br />

on the Table:<br />

1. Manufacture and Storage of Explosives Regulations 2005, laid under the Health and<br />

Safety at Work etc. Act 1974; (1082)<br />

2. (i) Common Agricultural Policy Single Payment and Support Schemes (Amendment)<br />

Regulations 2005— (1087)<br />

(ii) Civil Aviation (Insurance) Regulations 2005— (1089)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!