03.06.2014 Views

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

JOURNALS HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2004–05 JUDICIAL INDEX<br />

449<br />

Birmingham City Council<br />

(Respondents) v. Doherty (FC)<br />

(Petitioner) and Others:<br />

Petition for leave to appeal in accordance<br />

with the Administration of Justice Act<br />

1969 referred to Appeal Committee, public<br />

funding certificate, 31 Jan, 142<br />

Blackburn Chemicals Limited<br />

(Petitioners) v. Bim Kemi AB<br />

(Respondents):<br />

Petition for leave to appeal referred to<br />

Appeal Committee, 8 Dec, 51; report, 10<br />

Feb, 181<br />

BNP Paribas UK Holdings Limited<br />

and Others (Respondents) v. Her<br />

Majesty’s Commissioners of<br />

Inland Revenue (Appellants):<br />

Extensions of time, 1 Dec, 26; 12 Jan, 100;<br />

petition that appeal be conjoined, ordered<br />

as prayed, 10 Feb, 181<br />

For further proceedings see<br />

Autologic Holdings Plc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

BNP Paribas UK Holdings Limited and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

The Future Network Plc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

Perkins Engines Company Limited and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

HJ Heinz Company Inc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

British Telecommunications Plc and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

(conjoined appeals)<br />

Bottomley (Respondent) v.<br />

Secretary and Members of<br />

Todmorden Cricket Club<br />

(Appellants) and Others:<br />

Petition that appeal be withdrawn on the<br />

terms agreed between the parties ordered<br />

as prayed, 23 Mar, 359<br />

British Telecommunications Plc and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her<br />

Majesty’s Commissioners of<br />

Inland Revenue (Appellants):<br />

Extensions of time, 1 Dec, 26; 12 Jan, 101;<br />

petition that appeal be conjoined, ordered<br />

as prayed, 10 Feb, 181<br />

For further proceedings see<br />

Autologic Holdings Plc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

BNP Paribas UK Holdings Limited and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

The Future Network Plc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

Perkins Engines Company Limited and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

HJ Heinz Company Inc and Others<br />

(Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

British Telecommunications Plc and<br />

Others (Respondents) v. Her Majesty’s<br />

Commissioners of Inland Revenue<br />

(Appellants)<br />

(Conjoined Appeals)<br />

Brooks (FC) (Respondent) v.<br />

Commissioner of Police for the<br />

Metropolis (Appellant) and<br />

Others:<br />

Judgment, 21 Apr, 406<br />

Brown (Appellant) v. Scottish<br />

Ministers (Respondents)<br />

(Scotland):<br />

Extensions of time, 24 Nov, 6; 10 Jan, 92; 11<br />

Jan, 97; 19 Jan, 118; 16 Feb, 192; set down<br />

for hearing and referred to Appellate Committee,<br />

2 Mar, 237; petition to vacate hearing<br />

date and waive security for costs referred<br />

to Appeal Committee, 7 Apr, 395;<br />

report, 13 Apr, 402<br />

Brunt and Others (Petitioners) v.<br />

Southampton International<br />

Airport Limited (Respondents):<br />

Petition for leave to appeal referred to<br />

Appeal Committee, 7 Mar, 255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!