25.06.2014 Views

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20091231-0037 FERC PDF (Unofficia1) 12/29/2009<br />

Exhibit No. seE-SIC)<br />

Corporates<br />

Global Power<br />

U.S. and Canada<br />

Credit Analysis<br />

South Carolina Electric & Gas<br />

Company<br />

Subsidiary<br />

of <strong>SCANA</strong> Corporation<br />

Ratings<br />

Security Class Current<br />

Rati<br />

Issuer DefauLt Rating<br />

AM<br />

Senior Unsecured<br />

AM<br />

Outlook<br />

Stable<br />

Financial Data<br />

South Carolina Electric & Gas CO.<br />

($M;!.)<br />

LTM<br />

Ended<br />

3/31/09<br />

Year<br />

Ended<br />

12/31/08<br />

Revenue<br />

Gross Margin<br />

Cash flow from<br />

Operations<br />

Operating EBITDA<br />

TotaL Debt<br />

TotaL Capitalization<br />

ROE (%)<br />

(APEX/Depreciation<br />

(x)<br />

Analysts<br />

Robert Homick<br />

+ t 2 IZ 908-0523<br />

robert.hornick@fitchratings.com<br />

Jill Schmidt<br />

+1 21Z 908·0644<br />

jiLl.schmidt@fitchratings.com<br />

2,780<br />

1,484<br />

413<br />

827<br />

3,363<br />

6,283<br />

9.7<br />

2.'<br />

2,816<br />

1,485<br />

430<br />

824 •<br />

3,234<br />

6,120<br />

10.0<br />

2.8<br />

Rating Rationale<br />

• Fitch lowered South Carolina Electric ft Gas Company's (SCEftG) ratings to their<br />

present level in June 2009,<br />

• The downgrade reflects the financial pressure from the company's plans to<br />

construct and finance two nuclear generating units for service in 2016 and 2019,<br />

respectively. SCEftG will own 55% of the two units at an estimated cost of<br />

$6,3 billion,<br />

• The downgrade also reflects the increase in business risk from the construction of a<br />

project of this size and complexity, and the substantial increase in debt and total<br />

capital over the extended construction period, The nuclear expenditures together<br />

with investments in its existing utility plant will more than double SCEftG's net<br />

plant investment and total capital by the end of the construction period_<br />

The credit impact of the incremental debt burden is softened by legislation in South<br />

Carolina, the Base Load Review Act (BLRA), which permits utilities to recover<br />

capital costs, including a return on equity, during construction; and by sharing the<br />

construction costs with its joint owner Santee Cooper, a state-owned electric and<br />

water utility in South Carolina,<br />

• Other risk mitigants include an engineering procurement and construction (EPC)<br />

contract that fixes a portion of the plant cost and a financing plan that includes 50%<br />

equity financing.<br />

Key Rating Drivers<br />

• Maintaining budget and schedule for nuclear construction program will be critical to<br />

maintaining existing ratings.<br />

• Ratings will also be dependent on the timely receipt of annual rate adjustments to<br />

reflect nuclear-related construction work in progress in rate base.<br />

• The company's ability to secure non-nuclear rate adjustments is an important<br />

ratings factor,<br />

• Adherence to the financing plan of using a balanced mix of debt and equity to fund<br />

nuclear construction program is an important component of the ratings.<br />

Recent Events<br />

Nuclear Plant Progress<br />

On Feb, 11, 2009, the South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC) approved<br />

SCEftG's combined application for a certificate of environmental compatibility and<br />

public convenience and necessity, and for a base load review order to construct and<br />

operate a two-unit 2,234-megawatt (MW) nuclear facility to be located at the site of<br />

the existing V_c. Summer Nuclear Station_ The PSC determined the capacity was<br />

needed and that SCEftG's decision to construct the plant was prudent and the capital<br />

costs were reasonable, The prudency finding is binding on all future commissions as<br />

www.fitchratings.com August 3, 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!