SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...
SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...
SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20091231-0037 FERC PDF (Unofficia1) 12/29/2009<br />
Exhibrt No. SCE-5(C)<br />
Corpo rates<br />
long as construction proceeds in accordance with the schedules, estimates and<br />
projections, including contingencies, set forth in the approved application. The<br />
combined application was filed under the BLRA, which requires the PSC to conduct a<br />
full pre· construction prudency review of the proposed units and of the EPC contract<br />
under which the units will be built.<br />
As part of the order, the PSCalso approved the initial rate increase of $7.8 million, or<br />
0.4%, to recover the cost of capital on nuclear project expenditures through<br />
June 30, 2008. The new rates became effective March 29, 2009.<br />
On May 29, 2009, SCE&G filed for an additional 1.1% rate increase under the BLRA to<br />
recover capital costs from July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009. If approved, the new<br />
rates would become effective October 2009. Under the BLRA process, SCE&G is<br />
permitted to file each May to recover the cost of capital on its construction·work-inprogress<br />
(CWIP) balance as of the filing date, followed by a five-month review process,<br />
with new rates effective the following October.<br />
Fuel Cost Recovery<br />
On April 22, 2009, the PSC approved a settlement agreement between SCE&G, the<br />
Office of Regulatory Staff and others that provided for a three-year phase-in of<br />
SCE&G's uncollected fuel costs of about $110 million.<br />
City of Orangeburg<br />
On April 22, 2009, SCE&G agreed to continue to provide the City of Orangeburg, SC,<br />
with approximately 190 MW of wholesale electric power through 2010. The city<br />
extended its contract with SCE&Gafter the North Carolina PSCrejected a contract with<br />
Duke Energy Corporation (Duke) priced at Duke's average system cost rather than<br />
market.<br />
Liquidity and Debt Structure<br />
Liquidity for working capital<br />
purposes is provided by a $350<br />
million commercial paper program<br />
that is fully backed by a $400 million<br />
bank credit facility which expires in<br />
Dec. 2011. South Carolina Fuel Security<br />
Company, a direct subsidiary of FMB<br />
PC Bond<br />
<strong>SCANA</strong>, which acquires, owns and FMB<br />
provides financing for SCE&G's<br />
SCE&G Debt Maturity<br />
Coupon (%)<br />
6.7<br />
4.2<br />
7.125<br />
Schedule<br />
Amount<br />
Maturity<br />
($ Mil.)_~=D'".t••<br />
150 2/1/11<br />
4<br />
1111/12<br />
150 6115/13<br />
Source: Company reports.<br />
nuclear and fossil fuels and emission<br />
allowances, maintains an additional<br />
$250 million bank credit facility that matures in December 2011. At March 31, 2009,<br />
short-term borrowings totaled $92 million compared to $34 million at year-end 2008,<br />
and cash and equivalents amounted to $218 million. There are no financial covenants in<br />
the credit agreement.<br />
Debt maturities are sufficiently laddered and should be manageable. Maturities through<br />
2013 are shown in the table above. Thereafter, the next debt maturities are in 2018<br />
and 2032.<br />
2 South Carolina Electric & Gas Company August 3, 2009