25.06.2014 Views

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20091231-0037 FERC PDF (Unofficia1) 12/29/2009<br />

Exhibrt No. SCE-5(C)<br />

Corpo rates<br />

long as construction proceeds in accordance with the schedules, estimates and<br />

projections, including contingencies, set forth in the approved application. The<br />

combined application was filed under the BLRA, which requires the PSC to conduct a<br />

full pre· construction prudency review of the proposed units and of the EPC contract<br />

under which the units will be built.<br />

As part of the order, the PSCalso approved the initial rate increase of $7.8 million, or<br />

0.4%, to recover the cost of capital on nuclear project expenditures through<br />

June 30, 2008. The new rates became effective March 29, 2009.<br />

On May 29, 2009, SCE&G filed for an additional 1.1% rate increase under the BLRA to<br />

recover capital costs from July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009. If approved, the new<br />

rates would become effective October 2009. Under the BLRA process, SCE&G is<br />

permitted to file each May to recover the cost of capital on its construction·work-inprogress<br />

(CWIP) balance as of the filing date, followed by a five-month review process,<br />

with new rates effective the following October.<br />

Fuel Cost Recovery<br />

On April 22, 2009, the PSC approved a settlement agreement between SCE&G, the<br />

Office of Regulatory Staff and others that provided for a three-year phase-in of<br />

SCE&G's uncollected fuel costs of about $110 million.<br />

City of Orangeburg<br />

On April 22, 2009, SCE&G agreed to continue to provide the City of Orangeburg, SC,<br />

with approximately 190 MW of wholesale electric power through 2010. The city<br />

extended its contract with SCE&Gafter the North Carolina PSCrejected a contract with<br />

Duke Energy Corporation (Duke) priced at Duke's average system cost rather than<br />

market.<br />

Liquidity and Debt Structure<br />

Liquidity for working capital<br />

purposes is provided by a $350<br />

million commercial paper program<br />

that is fully backed by a $400 million<br />

bank credit facility which expires in<br />

Dec. 2011. South Carolina Fuel Security<br />

Company, a direct subsidiary of FMB<br />

PC Bond<br />

<strong>SCANA</strong>, which acquires, owns and FMB<br />

provides financing for SCE&G's<br />

SCE&G Debt Maturity<br />

Coupon (%)<br />

6.7<br />

4.2<br />

7.125<br />

Schedule<br />

Amount<br />

Maturity<br />

($ Mil.)_~=D'".t••<br />

150 2/1/11<br />

4<br />

1111/12<br />

150 6115/13<br />

Source: Company reports.<br />

nuclear and fossil fuels and emission<br />

allowances, maintains an additional<br />

$250 million bank credit facility that matures in December 2011. At March 31, 2009,<br />

short-term borrowings totaled $92 million compared to $34 million at year-end 2008,<br />

and cash and equivalents amounted to $218 million. There are no financial covenants in<br />

the credit agreement.<br />

Debt maturities are sufficiently laddered and should be manageable. Maturities through<br />

2013 are shown in the table above. Thereafter, the next debt maturities are in 2018<br />

and 2032.<br />

2 South Carolina Electric & Gas Company August 3, 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!