25.06.2014 Views

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20091231-0037 FERC PDF (Unofficia1) 12/29/2009<br />

Direct Testimony of Charles A. White<br />

Docket ERIO-_-OOO<br />

Page 10 of 17<br />

Exhibit No. SCE-6<br />

outside consultants' fees were incurred in connection with stakeholders meetings and<br />

2 drafting corporate governance documents, regulatory filings and the documents required<br />

3 for the October 2000 petition for declaratory order. For example, the October 2000 filing<br />

4 alone included the Limited Liability Agreement that created the governance structure for<br />

5 GridSouth sufficient to satisfY the independence requirement of Order No. 2000; the<br />

6 <strong>Transmission</strong> Operating Agreement that defined Functional Control and set out the<br />

7 contractual arrangement under which each participant transferred to GridSouth control of<br />

8 their transmission facilities and set out the general operational relationship between the<br />

9 GridSouth entity and each of Duke, CP&L and SCE&G; the Market Monitoring Protocol;<br />

10 the Operations Protocol that addressed congestion management, parallel path flows,<br />

II ancillary and energy imbalance services and detennined the methodology for A TC<br />

12 calculations; the Planning Protocol; and GridSouth's <strong>OATT</strong> that included a detailed<br />

13 description of the rates, rate designs used, a proposal for calculating service rates and<br />

14 charges as well as the GridSouth <strong>Transmission</strong> Service Charge fonnula rate; and the<br />

15 testimony of several expert witnesses.<br />

16 On November 3, 2000, the three GridSouth Sponsors filed a petition for declaratory order<br />

17 with the FERC seeking approval of their proposed accounting treatment for start-up costs<br />

18 and stated that they anticipated spending over $100 million in start-up costs for the period<br />

19 May IS, 2000 to December IS, 200 I. The FERC granted that petition and accepted the<br />

20 proposed accounting treatment for start-up costs in an order issued January 25, 200 I. In<br />

21 that order, the FERC said that the start-up costs could be accounted for as deferred debits,<br />

22 subject to the accrual of carrying charges and subject to recovery in a future rate case<br />

23 such as this one. The Commission made it clear that the GridSouth Sponsors might seek

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!