25.06.2014 Views

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SCEG OATT Formula Transmission Rate Filing.pdf - SCANA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20091231-0037 FERC PDF (Unofficia1) 12/29/2009<br />

Direct Testimony of Alan C. Heintz<br />

Docket ER 1O·~·OOO<br />

Page 25 of28<br />

Exhibit No. SeE·8<br />

and ensures there is no over-recovery with respect to charges assessed as the result of the<br />

2<br />

application of the formula. The classification, functionalization and allocation factors<br />

3<br />

used for the cost items reflect standard Commission ratemaking.<br />

Furthermore, all data<br />

4<br />

5<br />

used in Appendix A is taken directly out of the FERC Form I or reconciled back to the<br />

FERC Form I in the Attachments to Appendix A.<br />

6 Q.<br />

7<br />

8<br />

PLEASE DISCUSS SCE&G'S PROPOSAL TO BEGIN CHARGING FOR NITS<br />

THROUGH A STATED RATE, REPLACING THE CURRENT LOAD RATIO<br />

SHARE METHODOLOGY.<br />

9 A.<br />

SCE&G's proposal to use a stated rate based on a 12 CP divisor is consistent with what<br />

10<br />

the Commission has approved for other utilities.<br />

SCE&G's proposal to institute a stated<br />

II<br />

12<br />

NITS rate reflects its desire to provide a degree of rate certainty to purchasers of its<br />

network transmission services who currently face constantly changing rates because the<br />

13<br />

current NITS rates are calculated using the load ratio methodology.<br />

In other words,<br />

14<br />

SCE&G's proposal is consistent with and superior to the pro-forma <strong>OATT</strong> rate design<br />

15<br />

because it is simpler and more predictable for all transmission users.<br />

The Commission<br />

16<br />

17<br />

recognized the validity of this concern, when it approved Pennsylvania-New<br />

Maryland Interconnection, Inc.'s proposal of a stated rate for network service:<br />

Jersey-<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

The stated rate for network service is intended to provide greater rate<br />

certainty to suppliers and customers than exists under the load ratio share<br />

approach, because the ultimate transmission rate for a supplier under the<br />

load ratio share method will change depending not only on variations in<br />

the loads served by a particular supplier but on the loads served by others.<br />

Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection, LLC, 81 FERC ~ 61,257, at n. 44<br />

(1997). See also PJM Interconnection, LLe., et aI., 108 FERC ~ 61,318 (2004);

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!