01.07.2014 Views

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BDM CORPORATION<br />

<strong>The</strong> major demonstrations of 1966 were held on March 26 when protests<br />

took place in a dozen cities. <strong>The</strong> largest of the demonstrations,<br />

22,000 strong, was in New York. <strong>The</strong> rest of 1966 was focused on<br />

attempts to influence the President's Vietnam <strong>policy</strong> through the 1966<br />

election. Those elections were a clear setback for the Democratic<br />

Party which lost forty-seven House seats and three Senate rests to the<br />

Republicans. However, the antiwar movement could not claim that the<br />

rate reflected a repudiation of Johnson's Vietnam War policies. With<br />

the evidence of failure to influence <strong>policy</strong> making, the antiwar movement<br />

was in one of its recurring slumps.<br />

In 1967 two sets of demonstrations, April 8-15 and October 19-21 were<br />

the largest demonstrations yet organized and also marked a turning to<br />

massive resistance to the war policies. Vast crowds assembled in New<br />

York and San Francisco in April. <strong>The</strong> New York crowd was (very conservatively)<br />

numbered at 100-125,030 by the police and the San<br />

Francisco marchers filled the 65,000 Kezar Stadium. <strong>The</strong> antiwar<br />

movement participants were angered by the government's dismissal of<br />

the importance of the demonstrations and sought in the October fall<br />

offensive to find new ways to com::iand the government's attention. <strong>The</strong><br />

resistance tactics that were agreed upon worked a change in the antiwar<br />

movement.<br />

Four major street actions occured in 1967 which were designed to<br />

provoke viulence. Middle-class, middle-age participants played almost<br />

no part in these activities which were organized entirely by young<br />

people. <strong>The</strong> acceptance of planned violence was a symptom of the<br />

failure of the antiwar movement of the young because it illustrated<br />

how little had been achieved in three and a half years of demonstrating.<br />

Between 50 and 75-thousand young people joined the Saturday<br />

October 21 demonstrdtions in Washington. <strong>The</strong>re was a traditional<br />

rally at the Lincoln Memorial and then a march to the Pentagon across<br />

Arlington Memorial Bridge. Once across the bridge the SUS people and<br />

New York radicals broke from the police lines to the River Entrance<br />

Plaza of the building and some twenty-five crashed into the Pentagon<br />

itself. Through Saturday night and Sunday the demonstrators held<br />

their positions in front of the Pentagon. Sunday night the demonstration<br />

permit expired and the troops began to clear the Plaza.<br />

<strong>The</strong> "storming of the Pentagon," as it is known in the movement legend,<br />

marked the high water mark of the resistance stage of the antiwvar<br />

movement. In fact, even as the young demonstrators surged toward the<br />

Pentagon, thu movement itself was exhausted, frustrated, and<br />

splintered. Groups like the Vietnam Moritorium Committee were able to<br />

organize massive demonstrations in the fall of 1969 and in response to<br />

the expansion of the war into Cambodia in 1970 and 1971. However, the<br />

movement had spent itself. A sense of frustration and division<br />

permeated the young people and fed their sense that the government<br />

would respond to their call to withdraw from Vietnam. For a time in<br />

Lzc 54_<br />

Q 1--A<br />

.7ý<br />

2-43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!