policy - The Black Vault
policy - The Black Vault
policy - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE BDM CORPORATION<br />
portion of the American intellectual community.<br />
Opposition to the bellicosity<br />
of Goldwater had been one of the major factors that had recommended<br />
Johnson. Once it had fallen from grace with tne intellectuals, the Johnson<br />
administration never recovered. Every effort by the administration to<br />
buttress its position was rejected by the intellectuals as misleading. For<br />
instance, the State Department's White Paper on February 27, 1965 meant as<br />
a<br />
seventy-one page expose of North Vietnamese infiltration brought this<br />
response from the New Republic editors:<br />
<strong>The</strong> best that can be said about the State Department's<br />
White Paper on Vietnam is that it is entirely unconvincing.<br />
<strong>The</strong> worst is that it is contradictory, illogical<br />
and misleading. It has a desperate purpose: to<br />
prepare the moral platform for widening the war.25/<br />
<strong>The</strong> strength of the antiwar movement was provided by the youth of<br />
the college campuses, but they were dependent upon intellectuals like<br />
Wilhelm Reich, Eric Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, and Paul Goodman for putting<br />
the conflict in universal perspective. As the movement spread from campus<br />
to campus in 1965 it gathered to it spokesmen like Anatol Rapopport,<br />
Kenneth Boulding, and Arnold Kaufman who were leaders of the original Ann<br />
Arbor Teach-in, yet whose views varied considerably.<br />
<strong>The</strong> rupture between the American intellectual community and the<br />
Johnson administration poisoned the 1965 White House Festival of the Arts<br />
•..•" ;staying<br />
and pushed the controversy regarding the war beyond the boundaries of<br />
polite behavior. Individual artists invited to the festival joined in a<br />
common front of opposition to the president's war <strong>policy</strong> and refused to<br />
attend. Johnson was furious. He blamed hostility toward hi,, policies on<br />
the fact that he was a Southerner and declared that the intellectuals would<br />
never give him a chance no matter what he did "Some of them insult me by<br />
away and some of them insult me by coming."'26/<br />
<strong>The</strong> intellectuals continued to provide themes to the young<br />
activists through 1965 and into the first doldrum of the antiwar movement<br />
in 1966. <strong>The</strong> turn of the youth to resistance rather than protest in 1967<br />
provided a fresh outburst of expressions by intellectuals in support of<br />
2-17