01.07.2014 Views

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BDM CORPORATION<br />

C. Nixon Administration<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nixon Administration,<br />

relying upon the legal support of<br />

such advisers -As Assistant Attoroney General William Rehnquist, maintained<br />

that US<br />

actions in Vietnam were justified under the Commander-in-Chief<br />

clause of the Constitution.<br />

Unlike Katzenbach within Johnson's administration,<br />

no effort was made to find legal justification for President Nixon's<br />

decisions regarding Vietnam iii either SEATO or the Southeast Asia Resolution.<br />

Heavy reliance was placed instead upon the position of the president<br />

as Commander-in-Chief.<br />

Nixon saw no need to secure congressional approval<br />

as he explained the incursion into Cambodia in 1970, "<strong>The</strong> legal justification<br />

. . is the right of the President of the United States under the<br />

Constitution to protect the lives of American men." 71/ Opponents of the<br />

president's Vietnam policies in Congress found this argument one that<br />

provided the president full command of the war. No one would argue for a<br />

<strong>policy</strong> which might endanger American troops, yet such a justification<br />

permitted the president to continue US involvement. Such legal justification<br />

are circular arguments for involvement: US tr-ýops overseas must be •<br />

protected, so materiel must be sei:t to the troops, and hence the war will<br />

continue. It then becomes very difficult for Congress to terminate the<br />

war. 72/ Gespite the fact that .'s o,<br />

Vietnam <strong>policy</strong> was one of US withdrawal,<br />

the US incursion into Cambodia brought a resurgence of the legal<br />

arguments.<br />

Was the president acting within his constitutional authority as<br />

Commander-in-Chief? Or perhaps had Congress been denied its constitutionally<br />

granted authority to aeclare war? Legal scholars renewed their<br />

debates on prasidential authority to make tactical decisions during a war<br />

Sand on the authority of Congress to terminate the war. Nixon, however,<br />

continued to rely solely on his interpretation of a strung central presidency,<br />

and as late as April 1973, following the withdrawal of US troops,<br />

Nixon invoked his position as Commander-in-Chief responsible for the<br />

enforcement of Article 20 of the Paris agreement as justification for the<br />

E" continuation of the air war in Cambodia. 73/ Wher the Congress was jolted<br />

from passivity by the continuing war over Cambodia, it finally began tV<br />

reassert itself through exercise of the power of the purse and through<br />

I, 5-29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!