01.07.2014 Views

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

policy - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BDM CORPORATION<br />

concluded that the antiwar demonstration did not succeed in dramatizing the<br />

moral aspects of the war and that the presence of so many radical elements<br />

gave the puolic a contorted image of the movement.38/<br />

However, the "morality-of-the-war" issue was the point that seems<br />

to have separated the antiwar movement from the rest of the American<br />

people. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is room to question t.:e wisdom of stressing that<br />

very point as a strategy for expanding the political base of the ,oovement<br />

among "middle Americans."39/<br />

Studies have shown that the young and intellectual<br />

elites were definitely persuaded that from 1965 on the war was an<br />

immoral exercise of American imperialism.40/ Some extrapolated from this<br />

belief to an indictment of the whole of the American political, social, and<br />

economic system. However, the assumptions of the immorality of the war<br />

never did reach wide acceptance outside those groups. j:stead, the growing<br />

opposition to the war amorgc the general public, espe(..ally in 1967-1969<br />

(see Chapter 1), was based on the simple conclusion that the war didn't<br />

seem worth the price. Some measured the war in terms of the numbers of US<br />

dead and wounded. Others assessed the war's value in terms of the enormous<br />

resources being expended on it. Still others believed that the war was<br />

dangerously dividing the nation. Although not out of a sense of moral<br />

guilt, they concluded that the war had been a q.0stake.<br />

Neither the youth leaders who<br />

mobilized t.e demonstrations nor<br />

the intellectuals tiho provided the rhetoric and the rationale for the<br />

antiwar movement ware in positions to make political capital out of the<br />

growing public disenchantment with the war. jurely the positions of the<br />

early Teach-Ins in 1965 could have provided a non-radical base for tapping<br />

that mainstream discontent, but by 1967-1968 the movement had moved far to<br />

the left of what most Amoricans cons -dered politically acceptable.<br />

As<br />

the antiwar i ovement moved farther and farther to the left,<br />

amid leadership struggles and the splintering and resplintering of organizations,<br />

it became increasiily antiestablishment in its uirection.<br />

Every<br />

2-27<br />

= 7 J4 - -C'M

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!