2012 FDOT Mitigation Plan - Southwest Florida Water Management ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SW 77 - Conner Preserve.................................................................................................................. 302 SW 78 - Bahia Beach......................................................................................................................... 361 SW 79 - Fox Creek ROMA................................................................................................................. 374 SW 80 - Hidden Harbour.................................................................................................................... 382 SW 81 - Balm Boyette - Stallion Hammock Restoration.................................................................... 397 SW 82 - Ekker Tract........................................................................................................................... 416 SW 83 - Little Manatee River - Lower Tract....................................................................................... 429 SW 84 - Colt Creek State Park........................................................................................................... 439 SW 85 - Peace River Mitigation Bank................................................................................................ 454 SW 86 - Mobbly Bayou Wilderness Preserve.................................................................................... 460 SW 87 - Alligator Lake Management Area......................................................................................... 477 SW 88 - Curry Creek ROMA.............................................................................................................. 490 SW 89 - Myakka Mitigation Bank....................................................................................................... 501 SW 90 - Brooker Creek Buffer Preserve............................................................................................ 511 SW 91 - Upper Coastal Mitigation Bank............................................................................................. 524 SW 92 - Halpata Tastanaki Preserve................................................................................................. 531 Appendix A: FDOT Mitigation Program Statute.................................................................................... 543 Appendix B: ERP Watersheds in the Southwest FL Water Management District................................ 547 Appendix C: FDOT Wetland Impact Inventory, 2012........................................................................... 548
INTRODUCTION The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) historically conducted mitigation for wetland impacts associated with roadway construction on a project by project basis. The majority of these mitigation activities were associated with creation and enhancement of habitats adjacent to the roadway facilities. Existing and future commercial, industrial and residential developments along these roadways subject constructed mitigation areas to many limitations and risks in achieving the desired ecological benefits needed to compensate for wetland impacts. These developments also reduce mitigation opportunities as well as increase the cost of mitigation projects, primarily a result of the availability of property and the cost of acquisition. In 1996, the State Legislature determined that mitigation would be more effectively achieved with regional, long range mitigation planning instead of conducting mitigation on a project by project basis and created the FDOT Mitigation Program (see Section 373.4137, Florida Statutes). A copy of the current statutory language is provided in Appendix A. This program is administered by the state's Water Management Districts, which are responsible for annually developing a mitigation plan with input from various Federal and State regulatory and resource agencies, including representatives for public and private mitigation banks. Mitigation planning is based on an inventory of construction projects with direct wetland impacts that is provided by the FDOT. The minimum planning horizon is three years. However, the FDOT may elect to add to their inventory, projects with projected construction dates that extend beyond this planning horizon. This provides additional time for suitable mitigation projects to be developed, which is essential when mitigation options are limited. Mitigation options are limited when expected impacts are large or are to unique habitats, such as seagrass meadows, and when construction projects are located in urbanized watersheds. The project inventory is updated annually to account for changes that are determined as the FDOT projects move through planning, design and permitting phases. Inventory updates include: additions and deletions of construction projects; modifications to projected construction dates and adjustments to projected impact habitat type or acreages. Based on the impact information provided by the FDOT, mitigation projects are developed. The purpose of a mitigation project is to meet the State (ERP) and Federal (Section 404) permitting requirements for offsetting direct wetland impacts 1 . Both Federal and State mitigation requirements specify that habitats with similar value and function as those being impacted are to be created, enhanced or restored. Additionally, mitigation projects must be located in the same regional watershed as the projected wetland impacts. A map of the regional watersheds in the Southwest Florida Water Management District is provided in Appendix B. To maximize the effectiveness of a mitigation project, it should be of sufficient size and target a diversity of habitats in order to accommodate changing mitigation requirements that occur as the FDOT projects move from planning through design and permitting 1 Mitigation projects are not specifically designed to offset impacts to any State or Federally-listed wildlife species or any indirect wetland impacts that may be incurred as a result of road construction. However, if subsequent analysis determines that the mitigation activities are appropriate and adequate to meet offset these impacts these mitigation projects may be used for these purposes. 1
Page 1 and 2: Southwest Florida Water Management
Page 3: Upper Coastal Drainage.............
Page 7 and 8: An analysis of selected mitigation
Page 9 and 10: Charlotte Harbor Drainage Project:
Page 11 and 12: Mitigation: Colt Creek State Park (
Page 13 and 14: Status: No revisions, permitted Lit
Page 15 and 16: Project: SR 40 - CR 328 to SW 80th
Page 17 and 18: FM# 1976791 Mitigation: Peace - Cir
Page 19 and 20: Mitigation: Curry Creek Regional Mi
Page 21 and 22: FM#: 2555991 Mitigation: Cockroach
Page 23 and 24: Mitigation: Mobby Bayou Wilderness
Page 25 and 26: Mitigation: Anclote Parcel (SW54) S
Page 27 and 28: Mitigation: Conner Preserve (SW 77)
Page 29 and 30: Project: SR 200 - US 41 to Marion C
Page 31 and 32: flexibility to evaluate a mitigatio
Page 33 and 34: Status: Phase 1 construction-initia
Page 35 and 36: Status: Preservation - 198 acres To
Page 37 and 38: Description: Marsh (Salt) Creation
Page 39 and 40: Project: Ft. DeSoto Park ID#: SW 70
Page 41 and 42: REGIONAL MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND
Page 43 and 44: F. Brief explanation of why a SWIM
Page 45 and 46: Bursera simaruba gumbo limbo UPL Ch
Page 47 and 48: Port Charlotte El Jobean SR 776 - E
Page 49 and 50: Myakka River Project Limits - Phase
Page 51 and 52: REGIONAL MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND
Page 53 and 54: Hollomans Branch Hollom ans Branch
Page 55 and 56:
Berm Breach, Outfall to Lake Lakesh
Page 57 and 58:
REGIONAL MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND
Page 59 and 60:
Construction & Planting $1,336,000
Page 61 and 62:
Gateway - Observed Wildlife Species
Page 64 and 65:
Tampa Bay North Scale - 2000 ft. Ho
Page 66 and 67:
North Scale - 2000 ft. Ulmerton Roa
Page 68 and 69:
South Tract (2003) - pre-constructi
Page 70 and 71:
North Tract (2009) - improved tidal
Page 72 and 73:
Gateway was the first restoration p
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Project cost: $650,000 (total) Incl
Page 78 and 79:
FFWCC - Tenoroc Property Boundary P
Page 80 and 81:
FFWCC - Tenoroc Property Boundary O
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
CR 54 Loughman US Hwy. 17 17 < To D
Page 86 and 87:
E. Brief explanation of why a mitig
Page 88 and 89:
SW 50 - Terra Ceia Restoration Figu
Page 90 and 91:
Pre-Construction (1999) - wetlands
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Second Phase Construction - 2006-20
Page 96 and 97:
SW 51 - Myakka River State Park Fig
Page 98 and 99:
The eradication of exotic species i
Page 104 and 105:
100
Page 106 and 107:
102
Page 108 and 109:
104
Page 110 and 111:
egeneration of marsh and wet prairi
Page 112 and 113:
108
Page 114 and 115:
Restored Upland Habitat Created For
Page 116 and 117:
cypress-dominated wetland creation
Page 118 and 119:
02 25 16 11 25 16 14 25 16 Little R
Page 120 and 121:
116
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Construction & Planting $128,000 Ma
Page 126 and 127:
98 Mixed Forested Wetlands Hydrolog
Page 128 and 129:
Spring, 2001 - view of the 1.3 mile
Page 130 and 131:
Summer, 2000 - along with bisecting
Page 132 and 133:
Summer, 2000 - prior to constructio
Page 134 and 135:
C. Brief description of conducted w
Page 136 and 137:
groundwater evaluation for the Cock
Page 138 and 139:
Tampa Bay Hillsborough County ELAPP
Page 140 and 141:
Wetland Creation & Selmon Expresswa
Page 142 and 143:
Wetland Creation & Selmon Expresswa
Page 144 and 145:
Current Post--Construction (2009) -
Page 146 and 147:
impacts and location match the habi
Page 148 and 149:
View of the barge used to hydraulic
Page 150 and 151:
documented in the marsh and adjacen
Page 152 and 153:
148
Page 154 and 155:
150
Page 156 and 157:
152
Page 158 and 159:
the perimeter of the forested wetla
Page 160 and 161:
ATTACHMENT A - Hampton Tract - Exis
Page 162 and 163:
habitat, however it is anticipated
Page 164 and 165:
Green Swamp Wilderness Preserve (We
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Timeframe for implementation: Comme
Page 170 and 171:
Success criteria requirements inclu
Page 172 and 173:
County Line Road Hillsborough Count
Page 174 and 175:
170
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Project cost: $460,000 (total) Desi
Page 180 and 181:
92 600 Gandy Bridge Tampa Bay 587 0
Page 182 and 183:
Tampa Bay 100 50 0 100 Feet Decreas
Page 184 and 185:
During 2003 construction of the nor
Page 186 and 187:
Some fill material removal and the
Page 188 and 189:
only SWIM-sponsored project within
Page 190 and 191:
186
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
469 SR 50 To Clermont > Tarrytown S
Page 198 and 199:
FDOT MITIGATION SITE (Withlacoochee
Page 200 and 201:
and planting activities were conduc
Page 202 and 203:
The SWFWMD discontinued the row cro
Page 204 and 205:
There are five wetlands that had up
Page 206 and 207:
criteria required 90% survivorship
Page 208 and 209:
204
Page 210 and 211:
Property Boundary W15 W1 W6 W5 W4 W
Page 212 and 213:
Wetland 12 (2001) - Pre-constructio
Page 214 and 215:
Wetland 6 (2001) - Pre-construction
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
areas were further restored with th
Page 220 and 221:
3. Location map and design drawings
Page 222 and 223:
myrtle (Myrica cerifera) in the hig
Page 224 and 225:
Lakeland ST 33A £¤ 98 GH 570 Polk
Page 226 and 227:
Treatment Marsh Creation & Upland B
Page 228 and 229:
Western Wetland Restoration (2006)
Page 230 and 231:
Center Wetland Restoration (2005) -
Page 232 and 233:
Center Wetland Restoration (2009) -
Page 234 and 235:
Eastern Wetland Restoration (2006)
Page 236 and 237:
Wildlife - substantial populations
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
ATTACHMENTS 1. Description of pre-p
Page 242 and 243:
238
Page 244 and 245:
Tampa Bay TECO Power Plant 672 672
Page 246 and 247:
Dunes Project Boundary Inter-ti dal
Page 248 and 249:
Current Post-Construction Condition
Page 250 and 251:
the dense, high quality mangrove co
Page 252 and 253:
248
Page 254 and 255:
250
Page 256 and 257:
252
Page 258 and 259:
254
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Proposed timeframe for implementati
Page 264 and 265:
0.25 0.125 0 0.25 Miles Pinellas Ba
Page 266 and 267:
Ft. DeSoto Park - Historic Conditio
Page 268 and 269:
Bridge Construction & Channel Dredg
Page 270 and 271:
Ft. DeSoto Park Ecosystem Restorati
Page 272 and 273:
part of the Preserve. Prior to enha
Page 274 and 275:
Attachment A - Site Conditions and
Page 276 and 277:
St. Petersburg 19 Lake Maggiore Big
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
MITIGATION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION E
Page 282 and 283:
Project Site 4 - This remnant tram
Page 284 and 285:
15 25 17 22 25 17 14 25 17 1,250 62
Page 286 and 287:
Pre-Construction - Site 4 (2005) -
Page 288 and 289:
Pre-Construction - Site 8 (2005) -
Page 290 and 291:
C. Brief description of conducted w
Page 292 and 293:
activities will continue to be cond
Page 294 and 295:
Tidal Lagoon, Salt-Marsh, Saltern &
Page 296 and 297:
During Construction (2005) - view f
Page 298 and 299:
Current Conditions (2009) - view fr
Page 300 and 301:
Other common species include smartw
Page 302 and 303:
Attachment A - Existing and Propose
Page 304 and 305:
13 26 25 18 26 26 16 26 26 15 26 26
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
of hardwoods and myrtles within the
Page 310 and 311:
ATTACHMENTS 1. Description of exist
Page 312 and 313:
SR 52 Property Boundary (Yellow) Fo
Page 314 and 315:
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.....
Page 316 and 317:
Figure 1. Conner Preserve Location
Page 318 and 319:
Florida Department of Transportatio
Page 320 and 321:
Pine flatwoods - The intact pine fl
Page 322 and 323:
Gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphem
Page 324 and 325:
y trees and shrubs, such as willows
Page 326 and 327:
Figure 4 (Cont.). Conner Preserve L
Page 328 and 329:
RESTORATION PLAN Restoration Method
Page 330 and 331:
Site 2 Consists of 50-acres located
Page 332 and 333:
elevations, which once supported pi
Page 334 and 335:
Figure 11. Starkey Wilderness Park.
Page 336 and 337:
Proposed Upland Enhancement Upland
Page 338 and 339:
TIMELINE AND BUDGET This project wi
Page 340 and 341:
Table 3. Projected Project Costs. M
Page 342 and 343:
Norby, Monica Manton. Weed-beating
Page 344 and 345:
Table B. Conner Preserve FDOT Mitig
Page 346 and 347:
APPENDIX C - SEED DONOR SITE PREPAR
Page 348 and 349:
344
Page 350 and 351:
Photograph 3 Photograph 4 346
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
coverage of Brazilian pepper, cabba
Page 368 and 369:
3. Location map and design drawings
Page 370 and 371:
species include cabbage palm, salt-
Page 372 and 373:
Tampa Bay Drainage Basin BAHIA BEAC
Page 374 and 375:
Tampa Bay Drainage Basin BAHIA BEAC
Page 376 and 377:
FDOT MITIGATION (Tampa Bay Drainage
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Cost for FDOT Mitigation credits th
Page 382 and 383:
Proposed Habitat Conditions A combi
Page 384 and 385:
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Miles 681 SW
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
D. Brief explanation of how t his w
Page 390 and 391:
dominant tree cover includes live o
Page 392 and 393:
associated with county roadway faci
Page 394 and 395:
^ To Parrish 301 < To Ellenton - US
Page 396 and 397:
Upper Manatee River Road - Proposed
Page 398 and 399:
394
Page 400 and 401:
396
Page 402 and 403:
wildlife habitat conditions and cor
Page 404 and 405:
4. Schedule for work implementation
Page 406 and 407:
eport will include qualitative and
Page 408 and 409:
404
Page 410 and 411:
406
Page 412 and 413:
408
Page 414 and 415:
410
Page 416 and 417:
412
Page 418 and 419:
Stallion Hammock FDOT Mitig. Area -
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
is the Tampa Bay Mitigation Bank (T
Page 424 and 425:
increase in the future, this result
Page 426 and 427:
fish ponds hydrologically connect t
Page 428 and 429:
Alafia River 41 Gibsonton Bullfrog
Page 430 and 431:
SW 82 - Ekker Tract Figure B - Duri
Page 432 and 433:
428
Page 434 and 435:
The designated 142-acre project are
Page 436 and 437:
4. Detailed schedule for work imple
Page 438 and 439:
Project Area Little Manatee River
Page 440 and 441:
Wetland Enhancement - Wetland 1 is
Page 442 and 443:
High quality flatwood habitat withi
Page 444 and 445:
Project Description A. Overall proj
Page 446 and 447:
Land Acquisition & Associated Prese
Page 448 and 449:
the FDOT mitigation program. Of the
Page 450 and 451:
nesting, denning and foraging oppor
Page 452 and 453:
Deen Sti SW 84 - Colt Creek State P
Page 454 and 455:
471 Upland Restoration #1 Figure C
Page 456 and 457:
Gator Creek (Natural) Forested Wetl
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
458
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
natural recruitment and generation
Page 468 and 469:
A habitat map was created by Pinell
Page 470 and 471:
After the salt marsh areas will hav
Page 472 and 473:
within the salt marsh and removed s
Page 474 and 475:
470
Page 476 and 477:
472
Page 478 and 479:
474
Page 480 and 481:
476
Page 482 and 483:
and slash pine. Of particular note
Page 484 and 485:
Attachment A - Background, Site Con
Page 486 and 487:
(Woodwardia virginica) and cinnamon
Page 488 and 489:
484
Page 490 and 491:
486
Page 492 and 493:
488
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
494
Page 500 and 501:
496
Page 502 and 503:
498
Page 504 and 505:
500
Page 506 and 507:
estored wetland hydroperiod has lea
Page 508 and 509:
504
Page 510 and 511:
506
Page 512 and 513:
508
Page 514 and 515:
510
Page 516 and 517:
B. Brief description of current con
Page 518 and 519:
impacts areas are low-quality habit
Page 520 and 521:
77 77 54 54 Keystone Road Brooker C
Page 522 and 523:
Brooker Creek Buffer Preserve Bound
Page 524 and 525:
The majority of the upland acreage
Page 526 and 527:
The interior of the forested wetlan
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
Proposed timeframe for implementati
Page 532 and 533:
FDOT MITIGATION SITE (Upper Coastal
Page 534 and 535:
View of the spring surrounded by mi
Page 536 and 537:
duration of surface water inundatio
Page 538 and 539:
Page 540 and 541:
County Road 484 SW 92 - Halpata Tas
Page 542 and 543:
Cypress Pine Flatwood Uplands Uplan
Page 544 and 545:
The wetland floodplain grade elevat
Page 546 and 547:
Portions of the access road berm wi
Page 548 and 549:
to participate in this program shal
Page 550 and 551:
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. s. 1344 are m
Page 552 and 553:
APPENDIX C: FDOT WETLAND IMPACT INV
Page 554 and 555:
Mit. PlanYear FDOT District County
show all

2012 FDOT Mitigation Plan - Southwest Florida Water Management ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?