27.09.2014 Views

Special Issue; Products for Industrial Machinery - NTN

Special Issue; Products for Industrial Machinery - NTN

Special Issue; Products for Industrial Machinery - NTN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NTN</strong> TECHNICAL REVIEW No.742006<br />

3. Test Results and Discussion<br />

3.1 Ultrasonic fatigue test results<br />

3.1.1 SN characteristics<br />

The results of the ultrasonic fatigue test are plotted<br />

graphically in Fig. 6. Compared to the results obtained<br />

without hydrogen pre-charging, the fatigue strength<br />

with hydrogen pre-charging was much lower. In<br />

addition, fatigue strength decreased with greater<br />

current densities. As shown in Fig. 7, the mode of<br />

fracture was a fish-eye fracture initiated at a non-metal<br />

inclusion or other impurities within each test piece<br />

regardless of whether or not they were subjected to<br />

hydrogen pre-charging. Thus, no macro-scale<br />

difference in fracture mode was found.<br />

3.1.2 Relationship between fatigue strength and<br />

diffusible hydrogen content<br />

The relationship between the temperature and the<br />

hydrogen release rate were obtained from the thermal<br />

desorption analysis of hydrogen. The results are<br />

shown graphically in Fig. 8. The amount of hydrogen<br />

released was greater with greater hydrogen precharging<br />

current densities, peaking at around 80˚C.<br />

The hydrogen released at temperatures up to 200˚C<br />

Stress amplitude, MPa<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

1.E+04<br />

0.4mA/cm 2<br />

0.5mA/cm 2<br />

1.E+05<br />

No hydrogen pre-charging<br />

0.1mA/cm 2 0.2mA/cm 2<br />

1.E+06<br />

0.3mA/cm 2<br />

1.E+07<br />

Number of load repetitions<br />

Fig. 6 Results of ultrasonic fatigue testing<br />

1.E+08<br />

was defined as diffusible hydrogen and the amount of<br />

such hydrogen is plotted in Fig. 8.<br />

Based on the results shown in Figs. 6 and 8, the<br />

effects of diffusible hydrogen on fatigue strength of<br />

JIS-SUJ2 steel were evaluated considering the<br />

following two points.<br />

First, because scattering was present in fatigue test<br />

data, a statistical approach <strong>for</strong> handling the data was<br />

needed. Second, because premature flaking would<br />

accidentally occur on JIS-SUJ2 steel accidentally in<br />

real machines, it appeared reasonable to make the<br />

above-mentioned evaluation based on the<br />

characteristics of this material at around the fatigue<br />

limit rather than based on the high loading<br />

characteristics of this material, the latter being the<br />

evaluation practice in conventional rolling fatigued<br />

tests. Furthermore, the fatigue characteristics that can<br />

be reflected in machine designs appear to be fatigue<br />

strength-related characteristics rather than life-related<br />

characteristics. In this context, based on the JSMS-<br />

SD-6-02 SN curve regression method 6) of the Society<br />

of Materials Science, Japan, the fatigue test data was<br />

applied to a continuously-decreasing one-sided<br />

logarithmic curve model. In this way, the 50% fatigue<br />

strength curve and the 10% fatigue strength curve<br />

were determined. The curve in Fig. 9 is the 50%<br />

fatigue strength curve. The evaluation criterion was<br />

10% fatigue strength after 10 7 load application cycles.<br />

10 A NB D ABDconstants5<br />

The relationship between the amount of diffusible<br />

hydrogen and the 10% fatigue strength after 10 7 load<br />

application cycles is illustrated in Fig. 10. Since there<br />

is a good linear relation between these two factors, it<br />

could be understood that the loss in fatigue strength is<br />

governed by the diffusible hydrogen content.<br />

Hydrogen release rate, ppm/min<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.5mA/cm 2 6.5wt-ppm<br />

0.4mA/cm 2 5.3wt-ppm<br />

0.3mA/cm 2 4.5wt-ppm<br />

0.2mA/cm 2 3.5wt-ppm<br />

0.1mA/cm 2 2.2wt-ppm<br />

0.00<br />

0 100 200 300 400<br />

Temperature ˚C<br />

Fig. 7 Photograph of fracture center<br />

Fig. 8 Results of thermal desorption analysis of hydrogen<br />

-58-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!