01.10.2014 Views

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 SCIENTIFIC REASONING<br />

dollars in<strong>to</strong> your bank account. The fact that these solicitations do not disappear<br />

probably indicates that there are still many people who fall for them.<br />

13.1.9 Simplicity<br />

Roughly speaking, a simple theory is one with fewer assumptions <strong>and</strong> that posits<br />

fewer entities than its competi<strong>to</strong>rs. Many scientists believe strongly that we should<br />

search for simple theories if feasible. Albert Einstein once said, "Nature is the realization<br />

of the simplest that is mathematically conceivable."<br />

But why should we prefer simple theories? Is there any reason for thinking that<br />

the world is more likely <strong>to</strong> be simple than complicated? The value of simplicity as<br />

a theoretical virtue is disputed by many, <strong>and</strong> it would be impossible <strong>to</strong> settle the<br />

debate here. However, simple theories have a number of advantages. First, they<br />

are often easier <strong>to</strong> apply, so there is a practical reason <strong>to</strong> prefer a simpler theory.<br />

Second, a complicated theory postulating lots of different entities would require<br />

more evidence <strong>to</strong> support it. Finally, looking for simple theories coincide with the<br />

search for unifying causal mechanisms in our explanations. They help us underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the connections between different areas <strong>and</strong> offer a deeper explanation of<br />

the world.<br />

Weeping statues <strong>and</strong> miracles<br />

There are frequent reports of miracles by which religious statues wept<br />

tears or blood. People would come <strong>and</strong> worship the statutes <strong>and</strong> some<br />

even have claimed that the statues cured their illnesses. For example, in<br />

2002, a Virgin Mary statue near Perth, Australia, wept red tears for nearly<br />

five months, attracting lots of pilgrims. It is of course logically possible<br />

that a miracle had occurred, but the alternative explanation is that the<br />

tears were the result of either a hoax or natural causes (such as rust or<br />

melting paint). It is interesting that the tears in this particular case were<br />

found <strong>to</strong> be a mixture of vegetable oil <strong>and</strong> rose oil. When the statute<br />

was removed <strong>and</strong> placed under observation so that nobody could tamper<br />

with it, the tears s<strong>to</strong>pped. The vegetable <strong>and</strong> rose oil could of course<br />

still be a miracle. But if we apply the inference <strong>to</strong> the best explanation,<br />

taking in<strong>to</strong> account considerations such as simplicity <strong>and</strong> coherence, the<br />

supernatural explanation is not the most plausible one.<br />

13.2 RELYING ON EXPERT OPINION<br />

We cannot possibly know everything, <strong>and</strong> inevitably we need <strong>to</strong> rely on other people's<br />

analyses <strong>and</strong> opinions, especially when it comes <strong>to</strong> scientific or technical<br />

matters. But deferring <strong>to</strong> an expert does not mean we can s<strong>to</strong>p thinking criti-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!