01.10.2014 Views

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 SCIENTIFIC REASONING<br />

13.3 Some people claim <strong>to</strong> have a special sixth sense that enables them <strong>to</strong> see<br />

<strong>and</strong> communicate with ghosts. Since other people cannot see these ghosts, is this<br />

an untestable claim? If not, how would you test it?<br />

13.4 A man said he has special psychic power <strong>and</strong> can affect people's minds. He<br />

asked a scientist <strong>to</strong> think of a number between 1 <strong>and</strong> 20, <strong>and</strong> then tell him what<br />

it is. The scientist said he was thinking about the number 18. The man then <strong>to</strong>ok<br />

off his own left shoe <strong>and</strong> his sock, <strong>and</strong> the scientist was surprised <strong>to</strong> see that the<br />

number 18 was written on the man's foot. The man explained that he wrote it beforeh<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> manipulated the scientist's consciousness <strong>to</strong> make him think about<br />

the number 18. The scientist found this difficult <strong>to</strong> believe but there was no way<br />

the man could have written the number down while they were talking. Assuming<br />

all these facts, how would you explain the successful prediction if it was not due<br />

<strong>to</strong> the man's psychic power? How would you test these various explanations?<br />

13.5 Discuss <strong>and</strong> evaluate these claims about science.<br />

a) We accept lots of things in science even though they cannot be proven.<br />

That shows that faith is also an essential part of science, just like religion.<br />

It is therefore wrong <strong>to</strong> criticize a religion by saying that it has no solid<br />

proof.<br />

b) Psychology is not a science because psychologists cannot predict human<br />

behavior with 100% accuracy.<br />

c) Science uses induction. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, logic uses deduction.<br />

13.6 Kl In testing a theory it is important <strong>to</strong> think about its consequences. Consider<br />

the biblical theory that there was a huge flood on Earth about 5,000 years ago,<br />

wiping out all animals <strong>and</strong> people except Noah, his seven family members <strong>and</strong> the<br />

animals he carried on the ark. If this were true, what consequences might we be<br />

able <strong>to</strong> observe? For example, think about what the geological data might say, <strong>and</strong><br />

how the devastation would affect human his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> archaeological records. If all<br />

humans <strong>and</strong> animals came from the survivors on the ark, what might this mean<br />

for genetic diversity <strong>and</strong> the geographical distribution of animal species?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!