An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72 IDENTIFYING ARGUMENTS<br />
it easier <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>, evaluate, <strong>and</strong> remember the argument. If we do this often<br />
enough, it will also help us improve our critical thinking skills.<br />
Take this passage taken from the website of the Economist magazine:<br />
Voltaire once wrote, "If God did not exist, it would be necessary<br />
<strong>to</strong> invent him." Leaving aside whether we actually did, can the same<br />
be said of religion? Most of the world's population professes religious<br />
feelings of some sort, <strong>and</strong> these beliefs in turn underpin many strong<br />
communities, happy individuals <strong>and</strong> tremendous acts of charity.<br />
Yet the world can be a very nasty place despite its preponderance<br />
of religious inhabitants. When faith curdles in<strong>to</strong> dogmatism it often<br />
leads <strong>to</strong> arrogance, in<strong>to</strong>lerance <strong>and</strong> violence. In other words, religion<br />
is a force for bad as well as good <strong>and</strong> there is no simple metric with<br />
which <strong>to</strong> measure its net effect (Economist, 2010).<br />
The passage is very clearly written, <strong>and</strong> we can easily see that it contains an argument<br />
with the conclusion indicated by "in other words." But it can be condensed<br />
a lot further if we analyze it a little bit. Take the first paragraph. The quote in the<br />
first sentence sets the <strong>to</strong>pic of discussion but does not contribute <strong>to</strong> the argument<br />
at all. The second sentence is a question <strong>and</strong> also not part of the argument. The<br />
third sentence does include a crucial premise about the positive effects of religion,<br />
but it can be simplified further. Going through the second paragraph in the same<br />
way, we can rewrite the argument in the st<strong>and</strong>ard format as follows:<br />
Religion promotes strong communities, happiness, <strong>and</strong> charity.<br />
Religion also leads <strong>to</strong> arrogance, in<strong>to</strong>lerance, <strong>and</strong> violence.<br />
Religion has both good <strong>and</strong> bad consequences.<br />
We are now able <strong>to</strong> present the central argument even more clearly <strong>and</strong> succinctly.<br />
This makes it easier <strong>to</strong> explore the argument further. First of all, the argument<br />
seems quite acceptable. The premises seem true <strong>and</strong> they support the<br />
conclusion. Of course, the premises do not exhaust all the good <strong>and</strong> bad consequences<br />
of religion. Religion can also give rise <strong>to</strong> great art <strong>and</strong> culture (such as<br />
paintings <strong>and</strong> architecture), but it can also result in superstition <strong>and</strong> ignorance.<br />
As we can see, extracting <strong>and</strong> reformulating an argument helps us identify the<br />
central ideas so we can think more deeply <strong>and</strong> systematically. This analytical approach<br />
is particularly suitable for reading articles that aim <strong>to</strong> present arguments,<br />
evidence, <strong>and</strong> information. Here are the main steps involved:<br />
• Identify the premises <strong>and</strong> conclusions in the target passage.<br />
• Leave out superfluous material <strong>and</strong> focus on the main ideas. Delete anything<br />
that does not affect the central argument or the main points.<br />
• Reformulate <strong>and</strong> simplify the central ideas in your own words <strong>to</strong> make them<br />
easier <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>.