01.10.2014 Views

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RELYING ON EXPERT OPINION 121<br />

cally. In particular, we should check whether the expert is credible, accurate, <strong>and</strong><br />

unbiased. Here is a checklist of questions <strong>to</strong> think about:<br />

• What exactly is the expert's opinion? Sometimes media headlines can misrepresent<br />

an expert's opinion. A scientist might say there is some weak evidence<br />

suggesting a correlation between A <strong>and</strong> B, but the headline might<br />

simply say "A causes B." So check the actual evidence carefully.<br />

• Is the expert in the right field? Information is more reliable when it comes<br />

from an expert who knows the <strong>to</strong>pic well. In 2008, Europe's CERN labora<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

was about <strong>to</strong> activate a giant particle collider for studying suba<strong>to</strong>mic<br />

physics. But according <strong>to</strong> German chemist Ot<strong>to</strong> Rössler, the experiment<br />

should not proceed because it might create mini blackholes that could destroy<br />

the Earth. Rössler might be an expert in chemistry, but it does not<br />

mean he is equally an expert in particle physics. The collider is now in use<br />

<strong>and</strong> luckily we are still here.<br />

• Is the expert reliable? Does he or she have a good reputation? Sometimes<br />

the expert is anonymous, so we cannot verify the reliability of the expert. So<br />

be careful with information from web pages <strong>and</strong> blog posts with no citation.<br />

Furthermore, doc<strong>to</strong>rate degrees <strong>and</strong> special titles might not mean much.<br />

Even experts can often get things wrong, so it will be useful <strong>to</strong> know the past<br />

record of their opinion.<br />

• What is the context in which the opinion is made? We have seen that<br />

quotes can be taken out of context. <strong>An</strong>d sometimes people are joking, being<br />

emotional, or not being serious for some other reason. <strong>An</strong> opinion expressed<br />

informally might be more of a hunch than a judgment made in a<br />

public forum. <strong>An</strong> opinion expressed by an official <strong>and</strong> reputable professional<br />

organization is more weighty than one from an unknown scientist. A<br />

study published in a well-known journal probably has gone through a more<br />

rigorous review process than an unpublished report.<br />

• Do other authorities in the same field agree with the opinion? We should<br />

be cautious if authoritative experts disagree with each other. The credibility<br />

of an opinion increases when it is free from any serious dispute among independent<br />

experts in the same area. This is one reason why it is a good idea<br />

<strong>to</strong> get a second opinion when you are deciding what <strong>to</strong> do with a serious<br />

medical condition. Of course, with about seven billion people in the world,<br />

you can expect disagreement on just about every issue. We would need <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate the extent of the disagreement <strong>and</strong> the arguments on both sides.<br />

• Is there any conflict of interest? If a <strong>to</strong>bacco company says smoking is<br />

healthy, the claim does not have a lot of credibility since the company would<br />

benefit from lying. Similarly, if a software company commissions an expert<br />

who then publishes a report saying that the company's operating system is<br />

the most secure one in the market, we should be somewhat skeptical of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!