An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
26 DEFINITIONS<br />
sophisticated sense. Precising definitions allow us <strong>to</strong> refine questions, so we can<br />
gain a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how <strong>to</strong> answer them.<br />
3.4 CRITERIA FOR GOOD DEFINITIONS<br />
We have said that a reportive definition should not be <strong>to</strong>o wide or <strong>to</strong>o narrow. Here<br />
are more criteria for evaluating all kinds of definitions, not just reportive ones.<br />
3.4.1 Use intensional definitions if possible<br />
Philosophers very often draw a distinction between the extension <strong>and</strong> intension<br />
of a term (or concept). The extension of a term is the set of things <strong>to</strong> which the<br />
term applies. So for example, the extension of prime number is set of numbers<br />
{2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13,...}. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the intension of a term is its meaning.<br />
The intension of prime number would be "any integer larger than one which is<br />
completely divisible only by one <strong>and</strong> itself."<br />
When we define a term, should we define it by extension or intension? It depends,<br />
but we should use intensional definition where possible. A term such as<br />
human beinghas a very large extension. It is impossible <strong>to</strong> define the term by listing<br />
all the human beings there are. Furthermore, even if we are able <strong>to</strong> list all the<br />
items in the extension of a term, this might not explain the criterion for including<br />
them. Defining prime numbers as 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ... fails <strong>to</strong> explain how the numbers<br />
are selected <strong>and</strong> how the list should continue. <strong>An</strong> intensional definition is<br />
better. However, in some situations, an intensional definition might not be available.<br />
The seven deadly sins, for example, is unders<strong>to</strong>od as referring <strong>to</strong> pride, greed,<br />
envy, anger, lust, glut<strong>to</strong>ny, <strong>and</strong> sloth. There is of course a long s<strong>to</strong>ry about the his<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
of the term <strong>and</strong> why it is these seven sins that appear on the list. However,<br />
this his<strong>to</strong>ry is not relevant <strong>to</strong> the definition of the list.<br />
3.4.2 Avoid circularity<br />
A good definition should avoid circularity. A circular definition is one where the<br />
definiens cannot be unders<strong>to</strong>od without knowing the meaning of the definiendum.<br />
Consider the definition of time as "a quantity measured by clocks or watches."<br />
This definition is circular because we cannot fully explain what clocks <strong>and</strong> watches<br />
are without taking them as instruments that measure time. Similarly, sometimes<br />
people say "the meaning of life is <strong>to</strong> search for the meaning of life." This sounds<br />
profound, but taken as a definition, it is hopelessly circular <strong>and</strong> does not make<br />
much sense. If the meaning of life is <strong>to</strong> search for the meaning of life, then it follows<br />
that the meaning of life is <strong>to</strong> search for a search for the meaning of life, which<br />
is <strong>to</strong> search for a search for a search of the meaning of life, <strong>and</strong> so on. Of course, on<br />
a more charitable interpretation, perhaps the suggestion is that the mere process<br />
of searching for the meaning of life is itself sufficient <strong>to</strong> make one's life meaningful.<br />
But this does not seem very plausible. Imagine a selfish <strong>and</strong> bitter person who