01.10.2014 Views

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

246 SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES<br />

13.4 One explanation is that the man was just lucky, but this is not <strong>to</strong>o likely. The simpler<br />

<strong>and</strong> more plausible explanation is that the man has got all 20 numbers written down in<br />

various places on him, <strong>and</strong> depending on what his audience comes up with, he reveals the<br />

appropriate number, for example, on his left foot, on a piece of paper in his right pocket,<br />

or on his left wrist. To test whether this is the case, we can search him beforeh<strong>and</strong> or ask<br />

him <strong>to</strong> guess the number from a much larger range or have him write down beforeh<strong>and</strong> the<br />

number he is going <strong>to</strong> implant in the audience's mind.<br />

13.5.a It is indeed wrong <strong>to</strong> criticize a theory on the grounds that there is no proof that it<br />

is correct, if by that we mean the theory lacks conclusive evidence that entails the theory.<br />

But it would still be rational <strong>to</strong> accept a theory if it had plenty of evidence indicating that it<br />

was highly likely <strong>to</strong> be true. This is why it is also wrong <strong>to</strong> say that scientific theories that<br />

have not been proven true are accepted solely on the basis of faith, because these can be<br />

theories that have plenty of supporting evidence <strong>and</strong> can offer useful predictions.<br />

13.5.b A theory does not fail <strong>to</strong> be scientific just because it does not offer 100% accurate<br />

predictions. It could be that the theory is fine, but it is difficult <strong>to</strong> get precise data <strong>to</strong> make<br />

predictions in conjunction with the theory. A scientific theory can also make statistical <strong>and</strong><br />

probabilistic predictions without being able <strong>to</strong> predict every single event accurately.<br />

13.5.C It is wrong <strong>to</strong> think of science <strong>and</strong> logic as completely distinct. Science also relies<br />

on logic including deduction. Scientists need logic <strong>to</strong> discover the implications of their<br />

theories, generate predictions, <strong>and</strong> check for inconsistencies, among other things.<br />

SOLUTIONS FOR CHAPTER 14<br />

14.1.a The method of concomitant variations.<br />

14.1.b The method of difference.<br />

14.1.C The joint method.<br />

14.1.d The method of difference.<br />

14.2 Situation 1.<br />

14.3.a None can be applied, since there is no single cause common <strong>to</strong> all situations in<br />

which E occurred. It could be that E has multiple or complex causes, or its cause is not<br />

among the list here.<br />

14.3.b B, according <strong>to</strong> the joint method.<br />

14.3.C C, according <strong>to</strong> the joint method.<br />

14.3.d D.<br />

14.3.e C.<br />

14.4.a True. Given the more general joint method, there is no need for the method of agreement<br />

or the method of difference.<br />

14.4.b True.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!