24.10.2014 Views

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

flushing until mid-December 1984. Eight months <strong>of</strong><br />

closure had devastating effects on the estuary.<br />

While the reduction <strong>of</strong> tidal flushing is in itself a<br />

catastrophic event for a marine-dominated system,<br />

the situation was made worse by its coincidence<br />

with a year <strong>of</strong> near-zero rainfall. Channels became<br />

hypersaline (60 ppt in fall 1984; R. Rudnicki,<br />

SDSU, pers. comm.), shallow creek bottoms<br />

desiccated and turned to brick, and marsh soils<br />

became so dry and hypersaline (over 100 ppt in<br />

September 1984) that large areas <strong>of</strong> low-marsh<br />

vegetation died out (Figure 14). Bare patches<br />

within the salt marsh were obvious from the air in<br />

August 1984 (Figure 13).<br />

Tidal flushing was re~nstated in December 1984<br />

after dredging <strong>of</strong> the main estuary channel from the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> Sea Coast Drlve south to the mouth, and<br />

tidal flushing has cont~nued to the present Sand<br />

that washed eastward was bulldozed back to<br />

recreate dunes. wh~ch are now part <strong>of</strong> a dune<br />

revegetation program Addit~onal dredg~ng In the<br />

south arm <strong>of</strong> the estuary IS scheduled for 1986,<br />

and slmllar dune rebutldrng act~v~t~es are planned<br />

shallow embayment became the beach line, and<br />

only a narrow channel remained. Control <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />

traffic along the urban periphery <strong>of</strong> the estuary had<br />

allowed some vegetation regrowth.<br />

Disturbances that occurred south <strong>of</strong> the estuary<br />

mouth in the 1960's left scars that were still<br />

apparent in 1985. Near the Border Field State<br />

Park overlook, areas used to corral horses and an<br />

exercise track used to rehabilitate race horses<br />

have been slow to recover. Twenty years later, the<br />

highly compacted soils support only limited<br />

vegetation. Military installations, shown as<br />

irregular circles in the 1953 aerial photo (Figure<br />

10) were filled with sands washed from the beach<br />

and dune during the 1983 storm. Standing water<br />

accumulated east <strong>of</strong> the road to the overlook,<br />

allowing establishment <strong>of</strong> brackish marsh<br />

vegetation in that area. Reduced soil salinities and<br />

nutrient-rich sewage spills stimulated the invasion<br />

<strong>of</strong> weedy wetland species, such as brass buttons<br />

(Cotula coronopifolia).<br />

2.4 STREAMFLOW HISTORY<br />

In comparison w~th earl~er estuary cond~t~ons,<br />

several changes had occurred by 1985 (Figure 15)<br />

Natlve dune vegetation was almost entlrely gone<br />

both north and south <strong>of</strong> the mouth Along the<br />

channels, salt marsh vegetat~on that died back in<br />

1984 had begun to recover in 1985, although<br />

species cnrnpos~tion had changed (Chapter 5)<br />

Okes that once separated the sewage lagoons had<br />

been breached and wtdened (Chapter 6) <strong>The</strong><br />

islands In the mairl channel were obl~terated by the<br />

sand washover <strong>of</strong> 1983 <strong>The</strong> mouth was artlfrcially<br />

cut, and south <strong>of</strong> the new mouth, it is clear that the<br />

beach l~ne had moved Inland What was once a<br />

Streamflow in the San Diego region is the most<br />

variable in the United States, and differences<br />

between wet and dry years are greater than in any<br />

other part <strong>of</strong> the country (Pryde 1976). Even small<br />

variations in streamflow affect the coastal<br />

wetlands, because floodplains are narrow, and<br />

there is little volume <strong>of</strong> estuarine water present to<br />

ameliorate the impacts <strong>of</strong> increased or decreased<br />

flows.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Tijuana</strong> River drains a watershed <strong>of</strong><br />

448.323 ha, three-fourths <strong>of</strong> which is in Mexico<br />

(Figure 1). Of that watershed, 78% is behind dams<br />

(IBWC 1983). <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> reservoirs on<br />

streamflow are undetermined, because all three<br />

dams were installed before streams were gaged.<br />

Morena Dam dates to 191 2, Barrett to 1922, and<br />

Rodr~guez to 1936 <strong>The</strong>~respective capacltles are<br />

62 mill~on m3 (50,210 acre-ft), 55 mllllon m3<br />

(44.760 acre-ft), and 138 million m3 (111,880<br />

acre-ft) <strong>The</strong> largest and closest to <strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong><br />

is Rodr~guez Dam, just upstream <strong>of</strong> the clty <strong>of</strong><br />

Tljuana It IS ltkely that dry-season flows are lower<br />

and that flood flows are delayed by the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

these resefvorrs<br />

Flows <strong>of</strong> the Trjuana Rlver have been measured<br />

slnce 1937 at the Neslor gage, whtch includes<br />

99 6% <strong>of</strong> the watershed (F~gure 11 On the average<br />

the Tljuana River has ~ts peak flow in March<br />

(Figure 16) However. as w~th ratnfall data,<br />

averases tell little <strong>of</strong> the relationshl~ between<br />

streamflow and estuar~ne dynamics Year-to-year<br />

Figure 34. Cordgrass mortality during nontidai flows are h~ghly var~able (coefficient <strong>of</strong> variatron =<br />

conditions in 1984 (photo by J. fedler).<br />

325%)- as are monthly flows (c v = 690%) With

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!