24.10.2014 Views

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 38. <strong>The</strong> channel benthic community includes a wide variety <strong>of</strong> invertebrates. Illustrated are muilet in the<br />

water column; surface benthic animals from left to right: the horn snail, sea hare (Aplysia), mud snails (Nassarius),<br />

sand dollars, hermit crabs (Pagurus), egg cockle (Laev~cardium), sea cucumber (Molpadia) and its commensal pea<br />

crab (Pinnixla barnhart!), and the crab (Cancer productus) with attached mussels (Mytilus edulis); and burrowing in<br />

the sediments from left to right: the mud-flat brachiopod (Glottidia aibrda), bent nose clam, Californa jackknife clam<br />

(Tagelus caltforntanus), wavy chione (Chtone undatella), ghost shrimp, and spionid worms. Mclntire collection,<br />

copyright 1986 by Zedler.<br />

Peterson (19751 thought was due to the rarity <strong>of</strong><br />

other deep-burrowing competitors. Hydraulic<br />

harvesting <strong>of</strong> callianassid shrimp was common at<br />

<strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong> during the 1960's and 1970's;<br />

their removal, according to Peterson, allowed the<br />

clams to expand their populations with little effect<br />

on other dominant species. Manipulative field<br />

experiments supported his interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

data.<br />

During the winters <strong>of</strong> 1977-78, 1978-79, and<br />

1979-80, San Dtego County had unusually heavy<br />

rains, culm~nat~ng In the flood <strong>of</strong> 1980 when<br />

approximately tw~ce the normal precipitatron and<br />

28 times the mean annual streamflow were<br />

recorded <strong>The</strong> Influx <strong>of</strong> fresh water lowered<br />

channel sal~ntty to zero ppt, and the increased<br />

streamflow s~gn~f~cantly altered the sed~ment<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the channel bottoms<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the flood, sedlment gratn size<br />

decreased at three <strong>of</strong> flve sampllng srtes and<br />

increased at two (Rehse 1981) If sed~ment<br />

character~st~cs control specfes cornposit~on, then<br />

three predicttons regarding s~lt/clay deposition<br />

would follow from Hosmer's (1977) study (1 <strong>The</strong><br />

purple clam should be most affected, because it<br />

was conflned to coarser sed~ments, (2) the<br />

littleneck clam should be less affected because IPS<br />

highest denslty and bromass were at 15%-20%<br />

siltlclay, and (3) the false mya should be least<br />

affected, because their maxlmum b~omass and<br />

densit~es were at 35% siit/clay<br />

In 1980, Hosmer resampled several areas that<br />

were Included In h ~s 1977 thesis work, and Rehse<br />

(1981 compared the two data sets on btvalves and<br />

callianasstd shrimp Flooding caused mass<br />

mortalities <strong>of</strong> many species Absent from the 1980<br />

collect~ons were the yellow clam (Nonmenbs<br />

obesa), egg cockle (Laevtcard~um substrtatum),<br />

bentnose clam, whlte sand clam (Macoma secta).<br />

<strong>California</strong> mactra (Macfra cairlornrcai, Washington<br />

clam (Saxidomus nuttali/], Carpenter's tellen<br />

(Tell~na carpenter/?, and Calitanassa grgas <strong>The</strong><br />

dominant b~valve before the 1978-80 period was<br />

the purple clam, while the dominant in 1980 was<br />

false rnya<br />

4 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!