24.10.2014 Views

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

calculated from chlorophyll a measurements, so<br />

that other plankton could be estimated by<br />

subtract~on from totals Dead biomass was<br />

calculated by subtracting the live fraction from total<br />

POC. <strong>The</strong> difficult but precise analyses were<br />

necessary to quantify tidal water composition<br />

Over 1,850 samples were processed for carbon<br />

analysis in the 2-year study (Winfield 1980)<br />

Most studles <strong>of</strong> carbon flux ignore the DOC<br />

component. Yet at <strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong>, thts was the<br />

major form <strong>of</strong> carbon export (Figure 56)<br />

Concentratrons oi DOC in ebb ttde water <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

exceeded concentrations in flood tide water (Figure<br />

57). Furthermore, concentrattons <strong>of</strong> C In the<br />

drssolved form averaged much higher than In the<br />

part~culate form (Figure 58). DOC ranged from 1 to<br />

11 mg C/I, whrle POC ranged from 04 to 1 8 mg<br />

C/I <strong>of</strong> creek water. Thus, the ultimate removal <strong>of</strong><br />

organic mater~als produced in the marsh results<br />

from processes such as leaching <strong>of</strong> DOC from both<br />

trve and dead plants and anbmals and excretion <strong>of</strong><br />

organic molecules by piants and an~mals<br />

Detrltal carbon dominated the particulate<br />

component In t~dai waters, sarnetirnes making up<br />

98% <strong>of</strong> the PQC, and never less than 3tYU (Winfield<br />

1980). Live organisms made up the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

particulate matter only in June 1977 and April<br />

1978. Both times the live POC was largely algae,<br />

as indicated by chlorophyll concentrations. In<br />

contrast with DOC results, the POC data suggested<br />

that the salt marsh entrains particulate materials.<br />

although this is the net result <strong>of</strong> frequent import<br />

and occasior~al export.<br />

What fraction <strong>of</strong> marsh product~vrty is exported<br />

to tidal creeks' Based on his 10-month study<br />

penod, W~nfield (1980) estimated an annual export<br />

<strong>of</strong> 40 g C/m2/yr as DOC for the area domfnated by<br />

succulents and 110 g C/m2/yr for the area <strong>of</strong><br />

mixed cordgrass and succulents A net import <strong>of</strong><br />

partlcuiate carbon was determ~ned for POC, wrth<br />

annual estimates at 5-6 g C/m2/yr for the areas<br />

included in his two sampling statrons At most,<br />

then, there was a net removal <strong>of</strong> 105 g C/m7/yr,<br />

which is well below the net amount produced by<br />

vascular plants (approximately 220 g C/m2/yr.<br />

Secttan 4 3) and eptbenthlc algae (185-340 g<br />

C/ine'/yr) Add~t~onal fluxes <strong>of</strong> debris probably<br />

occurred on the water surface and as wind-borne<br />

mater~als, ne~ther was measured because <strong>of</strong><br />

enormous difficulties in sampling Because<br />

temporal variab~lity in all <strong>of</strong> these processes IS<br />

Figure 56. Net flux <strong>of</strong> parttculate (left) and diss<strong>of</strong>ved (right! organic carbon in tidal waters <strong>of</strong> (a) the succulentdominated<br />

and fb) mtxed cordgrass-succulent study s~tes <strong>of</strong> Wtnfield (1980). Reprinted with pernissron from<br />

Winfieid (18801.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!