24.10.2014 Views

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Water Depth fcmi<br />

Dry 1 3 5 7 9 1115 DfY 1 3 5 7 9 1115<br />

............<br />

3.6.1 Algae<br />

<strong>The</strong> obvrous plants <strong>of</strong> tntertrdal and subttdal<br />

areas are the macroalgae Vascular plants such as<br />

eelgrass (Zostera marrna) are absent, perhaps<br />

because the area <strong>of</strong> shallow water is too small or<br />

too dynamic for rooted plants to become<br />

established However, large populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Enferomorpha sp and/or sea lettuce (Ulva sp,<br />

Ftgure 37) somet~mes develop on the channel<br />

bottoms and later float to the water surface<br />

(Rudn!cki 1986) Seasonal dtstributron patterns<br />

are highly variable, but their abundance is usually<br />

greatest In sprlng (Chapter 4)<br />

Figure 35. Comparison <strong>of</strong> feeding patterns for four<br />

species <strong>of</strong> birds that feed in the blocked channel <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong>. Foraging microhabitats (entire<br />

stippled area) were defined as the water depth where<br />

birds were observed feeding and the depth to which<br />

they probed the sediments; dense stippling indicates<br />

where species spent more than 805 <strong>of</strong> their time<br />

foraging; number in brackets is sample size (reprinted<br />

from Boland 1981 with author's permission).<br />

3.6 ESTUARINE CHANNELS AND TlDAL<br />

CREEKS<br />

<strong>The</strong> channel habitats are important for a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> organtsms including macroalgae, phytoplankton,<br />

invertebrates, ftshes, and birds (Figure 36) <strong>The</strong><br />

Caiifornia least tern and other fish-eating species<br />

use deeper-water habitats, while shorebirds feed tn<br />

the intertidal zone at low tide Shorebtrd uses are<br />

d~scussed in the following section<br />

Channels are sublected to a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

envrronmental conditions Tidal flushing is greatest<br />

at the mouth and decreases with distance from the<br />

mouth, th~s general gradient In turn rnfluences<br />

water movement, salinity, temperature, nutrients,<br />

and d~ssolved gases Finer sediments are removed<br />

by hlgher current ~elOCitie~, so that substrates near<br />

the mouth have coarser sediments than in t~dal<br />

creeks Nutrtents brought into the estuary by tidal<br />

flush~ng are more readtly available to organrsms<br />

near the mouth Temperature salin~ty. and<br />

dissolved oxygen are less variable in areas <strong>of</strong><br />

deepest water than In tidai creeks <strong>The</strong>se<br />

environmental factors ~nfluence the species<br />

composttton, distributton, and populatfon dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the channel organisms<br />

Phytoplankton are also vartable in species<br />

composit~on and density Din<strong>of</strong>lagellates (e.g..<br />

Gymnod~n~urn spp 1, diatoms, f~lamentous bluegreen<br />

algae (cyanophytes), and unidentified<br />

unicelis or "monads" are all present rn the water<br />

column (Ftgure 37, Fong 1986) Wh~le mast <strong>of</strong><br />

these algae are typical planktonic species, the<br />

diatoms are all pennate forms with brlaterat<br />

symmetry and longitudtnal grooves that allow<br />

locomot~on on substrates Fong believes that most<br />

<strong>of</strong> these are resuspended from the sediments. <strong>The</strong><br />

monads are so tiny ica 1-2 microns diameter) that<br />

tdent~fication IS challenging; they appear to belong<br />

to the Cyanophyta (P Fong, SDSU, pers comm.).<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton species also occur In<br />

nearshore habttats, where their densities are lower<br />

During March-June blooms In the estuary, cell<br />

counts are higher than in marine waters by one to<br />

two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude<br />

Both Rudnickt (1986) and Fong (1986)<br />

associate algal blooms with reduced lrdal flushing<br />

<strong>The</strong> air photo <strong>of</strong> March 1984 (F~gure 13) shows<br />

high biomass <strong>of</strong> macroalgae in tidal creeks and<br />

along the shores <strong>of</strong> the abandoned sewage<br />

lagoons Because the 1983 winter storm washed<br />

dune sands into the matn estuarine channel, tidal<br />

flushing became sluggrsh and algal btornass<br />

accumulated Likewise, algal growth was high<br />

during the nontidal period <strong>of</strong> 1984 Channel waters<br />

were green with phytoplankton dtirrng the summer<br />

(Chapter 4) During the 1985 monthly censuses <strong>of</strong><br />

channel algae, Rudnlcki and Fong found the<br />

highest biomass <strong>of</strong> both macroalgae and<br />

phytoplankton in small t~dal creeks where current<br />

speeds were low<br />

3.6.2 Benthie invertebrates<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> invertebrates at <strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong> have<br />

included resource inventories and short-term or<br />

species-specrfrc tnvestigatrons, but most were<br />

conducted before the catastrophic disturbances<br />

d~scussed in Chapter 2. Data collected from<br />

precatastrophrc observations by a number <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!