The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile
The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile
The Ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: An Estuarine Profile
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Water Depth fcmi<br />
Dry 1 3 5 7 9 1115 DfY 1 3 5 7 9 1115<br />
............<br />
3.6.1 Algae<br />
<strong>The</strong> obvrous plants <strong>of</strong> tntertrdal and subttdal<br />
areas are the macroalgae Vascular plants such as<br />
eelgrass (Zostera marrna) are absent, perhaps<br />
because the area <strong>of</strong> shallow water is too small or<br />
too dynamic for rooted plants to become<br />
established However, large populations <strong>of</strong><br />
Enferomorpha sp and/or sea lettuce (Ulva sp,<br />
Ftgure 37) somet~mes develop on the channel<br />
bottoms and later float to the water surface<br />
(Rudn!cki 1986) Seasonal dtstributron patterns<br />
are highly variable, but their abundance is usually<br />
greatest In sprlng (Chapter 4)<br />
Figure 35. Comparison <strong>of</strong> feeding patterns for four<br />
species <strong>of</strong> birds that feed in the blocked channel <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong>. Foraging microhabitats (entire<br />
stippled area) were defined as the water depth where<br />
birds were observed feeding and the depth to which<br />
they probed the sediments; dense stippling indicates<br />
where species spent more than 805 <strong>of</strong> their time<br />
foraging; number in brackets is sample size (reprinted<br />
from Boland 1981 with author's permission).<br />
3.6 ESTUARINE CHANNELS AND TlDAL<br />
CREEKS<br />
<strong>The</strong> channel habitats are important for a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> organtsms including macroalgae, phytoplankton,<br />
invertebrates, ftshes, and birds (Figure 36) <strong>The</strong><br />
Caiifornia least tern and other fish-eating species<br />
use deeper-water habitats, while shorebirds feed tn<br />
the intertidal zone at low tide Shorebtrd uses are<br />
d~scussed in the following section<br />
Channels are sublected to a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
envrronmental conditions Tidal flushing is greatest<br />
at the mouth and decreases with distance from the<br />
mouth, th~s general gradient In turn rnfluences<br />
water movement, salinity, temperature, nutrients,<br />
and d~ssolved gases Finer sediments are removed<br />
by hlgher current ~elOCitie~, so that substrates near<br />
the mouth have coarser sediments than in t~dal<br />
creeks Nutrtents brought into the estuary by tidal<br />
flush~ng are more readtly available to organrsms<br />
near the mouth Temperature salin~ty. and<br />
dissolved oxygen are less variable in areas <strong>of</strong><br />
deepest water than In tidai creeks <strong>The</strong>se<br />
environmental factors ~nfluence the species<br />
composttton, distributton, and populatfon dynamics<br />
<strong>of</strong> the channel organisms<br />
Phytoplankton are also vartable in species<br />
composit~on and density Din<strong>of</strong>lagellates (e.g..<br />
Gymnod~n~urn spp 1, diatoms, f~lamentous bluegreen<br />
algae (cyanophytes), and unidentified<br />
unicelis or "monads" are all present rn the water<br />
column (Ftgure 37, Fong 1986) Wh~le mast <strong>of</strong><br />
these algae are typical planktonic species, the<br />
diatoms are all pennate forms with brlaterat<br />
symmetry and longitudtnal grooves that allow<br />
locomot~on on substrates Fong believes that most<br />
<strong>of</strong> these are resuspended from the sediments. <strong>The</strong><br />
monads are so tiny ica 1-2 microns diameter) that<br />
tdent~fication IS challenging; they appear to belong<br />
to the Cyanophyta (P Fong, SDSU, pers comm.).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton species also occur In<br />
nearshore habttats, where their densities are lower<br />
During March-June blooms In the estuary, cell<br />
counts are higher than in marine waters by one to<br />
two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude<br />
Both Rudnickt (1986) and Fong (1986)<br />
associate algal blooms with reduced lrdal flushing<br />
<strong>The</strong> air photo <strong>of</strong> March 1984 (F~gure 13) shows<br />
high biomass <strong>of</strong> macroalgae in tidal creeks and<br />
along the shores <strong>of</strong> the abandoned sewage<br />
lagoons Because the 1983 winter storm washed<br />
dune sands into the matn estuarine channel, tidal<br />
flushing became sluggrsh and algal btornass<br />
accumulated Likewise, algal growth was high<br />
during the nontidal period <strong>of</strong> 1984 Channel waters<br />
were green with phytoplankton dtirrng the summer<br />
(Chapter 4) During the 1985 monthly censuses <strong>of</strong><br />
channel algae, Rudnlcki and Fong found the<br />
highest biomass <strong>of</strong> both macroalgae and<br />
phytoplankton in small t~dal creeks where current<br />
speeds were low<br />
3.6.2 Benthie invertebrates<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> invertebrates at <strong>Tijuana</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong> have<br />
included resource inventories and short-term or<br />
species-specrfrc tnvestigatrons, but most were<br />
conducted before the catastrophic disturbances<br />
d~scussed in Chapter 2. Data collected from<br />
precatastrophrc observations by a number <strong>of</strong>