26.10.2014 Views

2009 Annual Report.pdf - Town of Milton

2009 Annual Report.pdf - Town of Milton

2009 Annual Report.pdf - Town of Milton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II. Non-Budget Articles.<br />

A. Bylaw Amendment to Allow Construction <strong>of</strong> Wind Turbines<br />

Article 42 would amend the <strong>Town</strong>s zoning bylaws to provide for the construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> two wind turbines on <strong>Town</strong> owned land. These two wind turbines<br />

could generate enough energy credits through the sale <strong>of</strong> electricity to the National<br />

Grid to <strong>of</strong>fset all <strong>of</strong> the electricity costs for <strong>Town</strong> and School owned buildings.<br />

It would cost approximately $8,000,000 to build the turbines the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

which may be eligible for grants or zero interest loans. This proposal received<br />

favorable response at public hearings.<br />

B. Establishment <strong>of</strong> an Affordable Housing Trust<br />

Article 43 would allow the <strong>Town</strong> to establish an affordable housing trust to<br />

accept revenue to be used for the furtherance <strong>of</strong> housing for low and moderate<br />

income families in the <strong>Town</strong>. The <strong>Town</strong> is anticipating receiving $50,000 from<br />

the 2 Adams Street project in lieu <strong>of</strong> Chapter 40B housing. Without the establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> this trust the <strong>Town</strong> would have no mechanism to accept this revenue.<br />

The trust would operate as an independent body with a five member board one<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom would be a member <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Selectmen.<br />

C. Continuation <strong>of</strong> Non-conforming uses <strong>of</strong> Building and Land<br />

Article 44 submitted by the Planning Board would eliminate the need for<br />

a public hearing and authorize the Building Inspector to allow the continued use<br />

by a new owner <strong>of</strong> non-conforming property in the <strong>Town</strong>’s business districts<br />

when such use is substantially the same or substantially similar to the use by the<br />

previous owner. This amendment would only apply when the non-conforming<br />

use was in relation to set back or dimensions. Residents would continue to<br />

have the right to challenge the Building Inspectors determination.<br />

D. Retaining Wall is not a Structure<br />

Article 45 submitted by the Planning Board would change the <strong>Town</strong>’s zoning<br />

bylaws to clarify that a retaining wall <strong>of</strong> five feet or less in height is not a<br />

structure. This article is in response to litigation. Without definitive language the<br />

courts concluded that a retaining wall was a structure and as a result was subject<br />

to the <strong>Town</strong>’s zoning laws with respect to minimum sets backs. This change<br />

will allow residents to construct a retaining wall not exceeding five feet at the<br />

property line.<br />

E. Amendment to Affordable Housing Zoning Bylaw<br />

Article 46 submitted by the Planning Board is a technical amendment designed<br />

to clarify that affordable housing units required for special permits<br />

granted under the zoning for the Central Avenue Planned Unit Development<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!