28.10.2014 Views

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Adm<strong>in</strong>istration</strong> and <strong>Forest</strong>ry Sector Development Prior to 1998<br />

sector, with much <strong>of</strong> this com<strong>in</strong>g from commercial logg<strong>in</strong>g. In 1960, the government<br />

formed Perusahaan Negara Perhutani, a state-owned forestry enterprise, which was<br />

given authority to manage the forests and plantations <strong>of</strong> Central and East Java, as<br />

well as some 6 million ha <strong>of</strong> forests <strong>in</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> Kalimantan.<br />

Because the central government was assigned no specific authority under<br />

Regulation 64/1957 to adm<strong>in</strong>ister commercial logg<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> the Outer Islands,<br />

the <strong>Forest</strong>ry Department <strong>in</strong> Jakarta was only able to allocate this vast tract <strong>of</strong><br />

forestland to Perhutani after first exempt<strong>in</strong>g it from the 1957 regulation. National-level<br />

policymakers did so by issu<strong>in</strong>g a series <strong>of</strong> decrees which effectively exempted these<br />

areas from be<strong>in</strong>g covered by Regulation 64/1957. Although the central government<br />

succeeded <strong>in</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g 6 million ha <strong>in</strong> this manner, each <strong>of</strong> these acquisitions was<br />

preceded by a political struggle between Jakarta and the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government<br />

concerned (Magenda 1991). 8<br />

In an effort to generate export revenues, Perhutani entered <strong>in</strong>to a productionshar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agreement with a consortium <strong>of</strong> Japanese timber <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> 1963 (Barr 1999).<br />

The Kalimantan <strong>Forest</strong> Development Cooperation Co., Ltd. (FDC) was made up <strong>of</strong><br />

Japanese trad<strong>in</strong>g companies, mach<strong>in</strong>ery manufacturers, shipp<strong>in</strong>g companies, and<br />

plywood producers (JATAN 1992). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the production-shar<strong>in</strong>g contract, the<br />

FDC agreed to provide Perhutani with US$ 30 million <strong>in</strong> credit to construct logg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

roads, load<strong>in</strong>g facilities, and timber camps and to obta<strong>in</strong> the fell<strong>in</strong>g equipment and<br />

log transport vehicles that Perhutani would need to <strong>in</strong>itiate timber extraction <strong>in</strong> East<br />

Kalimantan. Perhutani, <strong>in</strong> turn, agreed to export 70% <strong>of</strong> the logs cut to the FDC at<br />

pre-set prices and to allocate 30% <strong>of</strong> its log exports toward repayment <strong>of</strong> the credit<br />

extended (Gibson 1966).<br />

Under this agreement, Perhutani established seven logg<strong>in</strong>g concessions cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> 280,000 ha <strong>in</strong> East Kalimantan between December 1963 and March 1967.<br />

The state forestry corporation also opened two concessions total<strong>in</strong>g 205,000 ha <strong>in</strong><br />

South and Central Kalimantan under a similar agreement with the Mitsui Overseas<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>ry Development Corporation (Directorate General <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry [DGF] 1967).<br />

These production-shar<strong>in</strong>g operations never met either party’s expectations, however,<br />

as output consistently fell far short <strong>of</strong> the 1.6 million m 3 annual production target<br />

announced when the orig<strong>in</strong>al agreement was signed (Gibson 1966).<br />

In 1965, Soekarno’s last full year <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, <strong>Indonesia</strong> exported only 209,000 m 3<br />

<strong>of</strong> hardwood logs, generat<strong>in</strong>g US$ 2.6 million <strong>in</strong> exchange earn<strong>in</strong>gs (FAO Yearbook;<br />

Sacerdoti 1979a). This volume accounted for less than 2% <strong>of</strong> overall timber exports<br />

from <strong>in</strong>sular Southeast Asia, as <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s log shipments were far surpassed by those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es and Malaysia.<br />

2.3 New Order Timber Policy and the Basic <strong>Forest</strong>ry Law<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1967<br />

With the emergence <strong>of</strong> Soeharto’s New Order regime <strong>in</strong> 1966, the national government’s<br />

authority to adm<strong>in</strong>ister forest resources <strong>in</strong> the Outer Islands expanded dramatically<br />

(Barr 1999). This was largely driven by the new government’s <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

forestry sector to large-scale commercial logg<strong>in</strong>g. At that po<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s economy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!