28.10.2014 Views

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, Implications ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Adm<strong>in</strong>istration</strong> and <strong>Forest</strong>ry Sector Development Prior to 1998<br />

control over Outer Island forests substantially expanded the timber resources<br />

available for distribution to national-level state elites and their bus<strong>in</strong>ess partners. This<br />

simultaneously <strong>in</strong>creased the accumulation <strong>of</strong> opportunities open to Jakarta-based<br />

powerholders and drastically curtailed the resources flow<strong>in</strong>g through prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

patronage networks. Indeed, the revocation <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments’ authority to<br />

allocate logg<strong>in</strong>g concessions, even <strong>of</strong> limited size, abruptly reoriented the revenue<br />

bases <strong>of</strong> timber-rich prov<strong>in</strong>ces from exploitation <strong>of</strong> local resources to allocations<br />

from the central government (Magenda 1991). In this way, the centralization <strong>of</strong><br />

timber licens<strong>in</strong>g effectively tightened Jakarta’s control over economic and political<br />

activity <strong>in</strong> many parts <strong>of</strong> the Outer Islands. 15<br />

With full control over the distribution <strong>of</strong> logg<strong>in</strong>g concessions, the national<br />

government accelerated its efforts to make <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s forest resources available<br />

to privately-owned logg<strong>in</strong>g companies. Through the 1970s, the Directorate General<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry repeatedly expanded the area <strong>of</strong> forest estate designated as ‘production<br />

forest’, rais<strong>in</strong>g it to 64 million ha by 1980. With another 30 million ha slated for<br />

clear<strong>in</strong>g as ‘conversion forest’, no less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the nation’s total land area was<br />

made available to private <strong>in</strong>vestors for timber extraction. Dur<strong>in</strong>g 1971-1980, the<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>ry Department distributed 438 HPHs cover<strong>in</strong>g 43 million ha, to br<strong>in</strong>g the total<br />

area <strong>of</strong> logg<strong>in</strong>g concessions allocated dur<strong>in</strong>g the New Order regime’s first 14 years<br />

to 53 million ha (PDBI 1988). While most <strong>of</strong> these were allocated to privately owned<br />

timber companies, the state forestry enterprises Inhutani I, Inhutani II, and Inhutani<br />

III collectively held five concessions cover<strong>in</strong>g an aggregate <strong>of</strong> 3.8 million ha.<br />

The New Order government’s policy <strong>of</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s timber sector<br />

to private <strong>in</strong>vestment quickly generated large volumes <strong>of</strong> log exports and foreign<br />

exchange earn<strong>in</strong>gs. The nation’s log production rose by 470% dur<strong>in</strong>g the Soeharto<br />

regime’s first eight years, climb<strong>in</strong>g from 6.0 million m 3 <strong>in</strong> 1966 to 28.3 million m 3<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1973. As significantly, the recorded volume <strong>of</strong> log exports dur<strong>in</strong>g this period rose<br />

from 334,000 m 3 to 18.5 million m 3 . By 1973, <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s logg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry generated<br />

US$ 562 million, or 18% <strong>of</strong> the nation’s total exchange earn<strong>in</strong>gs (Barr 1999). While<br />

the timber sector’s contribution to GNP dropped substantially follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1973 oil<br />

boom, <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s log export levels and the revenues they produced reached new<br />

heights <strong>in</strong> the late 1970s. The reported volume <strong>of</strong> unprocessed timber shipped overseas<br />

exceeded 20 million m 3 per year dur<strong>in</strong>g 1976-1978, when <strong>Indonesia</strong> supplied 44% <strong>of</strong><br />

world hardwood log exports. Moreover, annual earn<strong>in</strong>gs from log exports exceeded<br />

US$ 1.5 billion dur<strong>in</strong>g the timber boom <strong>of</strong> 1979-1980. It is possible that the real<br />

volume and value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indonesia</strong>n timber exports dur<strong>in</strong>g this period were substantially<br />

greater than these <strong>of</strong>ficial figures suggest.<br />

2.6 Growth <strong>of</strong> Domestic Wood Process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the 1980s<br />

and 1990s<br />

Through the early 1980s, New Order policymakers phased <strong>in</strong> a national ban on<br />

log exports to push timber concession-holders to <strong>in</strong>vest downstream <strong>in</strong> plywood<br />

production. The ban had two far-reach<strong>in</strong>g effects on the structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indonesia</strong>’s<br />

timber <strong>in</strong>dustry: On the one hand, it effectively concentrated control over the nation’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!