28.10.2014 Views

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING<br />

<strong>Management</strong>’s Comments<br />

Provided by CENRO-Malaybalay<br />

Non PO members within CBFM areas<br />

can not be driven out even they do not<br />

join the organization as per our<br />

existing laws (RAs 8371, 7586 and<br />

7160). We cannot also suspend the<br />

issuance of CBFMA to those<br />

interested farmers due to noncooperation<br />

of some of the minority<br />

farmers within the watershed/<br />

community. As a compromise, work<br />

and collaboration should already start<br />

to those interested farmers and<br />

overtime, we are confident that the<br />

course of nature will force them to<br />

join the organization and practice<br />

sustainable upland farming system<br />

principles, advocated by the CBFM<br />

community. Some of the compelling<br />

indicators which will ultimately force<br />

them to join includes low production<br />

due to poor soil management,<br />

exclusion in the financial assistance<br />

channeled through the organization<br />

and the non issuance of a tree cutting<br />

permit. On the other hand there are<br />

cases where farmers do not want to<br />

join the organization because of their<br />

personal indifference with some of the<br />

organizers/leaders which is already<br />

beyond our control. On the other<br />

hand, those who were not given the<br />

priority to receive assistance from the<br />

government, tend to distance<br />

themselves from the organization.<br />

Momentarily, non-participation by<br />

some members of the community may<br />

still be an issue but this is very<br />

temporary in nature.<br />

Per our assessment, the four (4) PO’s<br />

have already attained a certain degree<br />

of responsibility and commitment of<br />

protecting natural resources entrusted<br />

to them contrary to the audit<br />

observation. This is, if we compare<br />

them before the project implementa-<br />

Team’s Rejoinder<br />

While the team agrees with the<br />

CENRO that non PO members could<br />

not be driven out, the presence of 47%<br />

non PO members is affecting the<br />

development of the area. Considering<br />

that the PO and the DENR could not<br />

totally disregard the rights of non PO<br />

members and development on such<br />

areas could not be undertaken, there is<br />

a need to establish a minimum<br />

percentage of membership before<br />

awarding CBFMA.<br />

While it maybe true that only one<br />

major fire occurrence was noted by<br />

the team, this could have been<br />

prevented had the required protection<br />

activities been undertaken by the PO.<br />

It was reported that the fire occurrence<br />

destroyed about 50 hectares of the<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!