Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn
Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn
Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES<br />
PO<br />
Name<br />
Area per<br />
Surviva<br />
l<br />
DENR<br />
Rate<br />
Tally<br />
Sheet Parcel# DENR COA Pictures<br />
OSA Palha, J. 2.37 IAF19 97-98 90% 15%<br />
OSA Canete, I. 1.05 IAF4 97-98 89.52% 0%<br />
SAHA Magale, S. 5.25 <strong>II</strong>AS2 97-98 92.80% 20%<br />
The erroneous reporting would have a great impact on the payment of CSD<br />
accomplishments and release of retention fee. Consider:<br />
• The reported double entry connotes double counting which consequently increased the actual<br />
developed area. It must be noted that CSD accomplishments on established plantations were<br />
paid on a per hectare basis, thus, double reporting also results in double payment;<br />
• Inconsistent reporting of project size also connotes excess payment on CSD contract since as<br />
mentioned, payment is on a per hectare basis, hence, the bigger the size, the bigger the<br />
payment;<br />
• Fictitious areas as manifested by their absence in other reports connotes excess payment as<br />
this means payment for something that were not really accomplished;<br />
• Any unreasonable increase in project area will affect WASR as bigger areas contribute much<br />
in the weighted average rate computation; and<br />
• Overstated survival rate in some parcels contributed to the attainment of survival rate<br />
benchmark.<br />
The inconsistencies of data maintained by DENR manifest unreliable<br />
reporting system. As long as these reports remain unreconciled, the actual<br />
accomplishments of the POs could not be determined.<br />
<strong>Management</strong>’s Comments<br />
Provided by CENRO- Malaybalay<br />
While it is true that there were double<br />
entries of recording in both M<br />
& E and DENR tally sheet of certain<br />
PO developer in Reforestation and<br />
Agro-forestry component of POs, we<br />
Team’s Rejoinder<br />
The double entries in the M & E<br />
report were not corrected but were<br />
also reflected in the DENR<br />
validation report. As explained by the<br />
CENRO, the validation report was<br />
94