Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Management’s Comments With regards to CRMF compliance of the 92 identified CBFM-POs, they were given until June 2006 of the current year to submit their Comprehensive Resource Management Framework. The delay is attributed to the limited time of CBFM Officer to handle all programs outlined under the CBFMP. Added to that, the Peoples Organization are too dependent with the DENR technical and financial supports which cannot be accommodated also given the very limited budget. Provided by CENRO - Bayombong Although this Office did not follow the outline/format in reporting CBFM- PO accomplishment, monthly reports had been submitted from the time the project was converted from Reforestation into CBFM Project. As gleaned in the attached monthly report specifically in the issues and concerns, actions taken to improve PO performance by the DENR-SUSIMO have been reflected. Attached also is the report of inventory of the stumps, branches, roots conducted by our personnel in response to the resolution # 02 of the PO. Team’s Rejoinder DENR should closely monitor submission of CRMF on the prescribed deadline. This only manifests that the trainings conducted to prepare the POs were not yet adequate to enable them to manage their responsibilities with least supervision and assistance. The team agrees that the management is preparing monthly reports. However, these reports were not compared with the approved Annual Work Plan. Thus, unimplemented activities were not noted and given remedial actions. The conduct of this activity was only one of the activities identified in the 2003 AWP of the PO. The PO did not even include this in the report. Apparently, the inventory was undertaken by the DENR itself. The PO’s performance should be monitored and assessed in the light of its compliance with its AWP and CRMF. 2. In PWRS, the POs’ accomplishments during CSD implementation could not be relied upon as accomplishment reports reflect double entries affecting the total area accomplished while some reported 90
ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES accomplishment differs from one report to another. Thus, actual accomplishment of the POs could not be determined. The team’s validation disclosed further discrepancies affecting the accuracy of reports. Under Section 6.2 of DAO 2001-01, the release of retention fee is subject to compliance with the following requirements, among others: • Approved final subproject area is fully planted and developed; • The weighted average survival rate of seedlings planted in the whole subproject should be at least eighty percent (80%). Individual component’s computation shall be based on the planting density of each component’s target; • For the reforestation component, the average height of seedlings shall be at least one (1) meter except for rattan, bamboo and other non-timber components whose quality shall be based on the technical judgment of expert evaluators; • All structural improvements specified in the latest approved contract have been completed; and • Terminal report with updated maps and dated photographs duly certified by the CENRO as recommended by SUSIMO. The photographs should be composed of close-ups and panoramic views of the subproject’s accomplishments. As maybe noted, the PO is required to submit terminal report. The validations of physical accomplishment were contracted by the DENR to an NGO whose responsibilities are embodied under MC 2001-04. The NGO’s validation activities are documented in the Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) Report required to be submitted upon expiration of the contract. The NGO’s report is still subjected to final validation by the DENR Composite Team which is required to submit Validation report. Review of the M & E, Validation and Terminal reports, however, revealed discrepancies rendering the reported total area developed and computation of the Weighted Average Survival Rates inaccurate as illustrated below: • 10 parcels were counted twice in both M & E and DENR tally sheets resulting in increased reported developed area by 13.20 hectares. It may even be noted that in some cases, the location and plant species in the 1 st entry is not the same in the 2 nd entry while the reported WASR differ in almost all cases, as illustrated below: 1 st entry 2 nd Entry PO/Member Area Parcel No. WASR/ Area Parcel No. /Location Specie /Location WASR/ Specie OSA IR1 97-98 96.50 1.01 IR1 97-98 95.00 Capio, E. 1.01 Malungon Mn Malungon Mn IR9 1996 86.00 1.38 IR9 1996 85.84 Yambagon, F. 1.00 Palocpoc Gm Palocpoc Mn IIAF10 97-98 96.20 0.84 IIAF10 97-98 96.20 Guimba, T. 0.84 Saging Du,Bn Saging Du,Bn Palha, J./ IAF19 97-98 90.00 2.37 IAF19 97-98 92.50 Tamunan M 2.37 Malungon Mg,Bn Malungon Du,Cf 91
Page 1 and 2:
Management Services Report No. 2005
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Page Part I Executive Summ
Page 5 and 6:
Part I Executive Summary 1
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On July 19, 1995,
Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • POs in all se
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY also forwarded ex
Page 13 and 14:
COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
PENRO INTRODUCTION The DENR is the
Page 29 and 30:
PENRO ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The
Page 31 and 32:
PENRO BUKIDNON PENR Officer Secreta
Page 33 and 34:
PENRO LOCATION/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Part IV Audit Observations 35
Page 41 and 42:
EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING INTR
Page 43 and 44: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING live
Page 45 and 46: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Live
Page 47 and 48: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING The
Page 49 and 50: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CBFM
Page 51 and 52: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CENR
Page 53 and 54: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Mana
Page 55 and 56: SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANC
Page 87 and 88: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES INTR
Page 89 and 90: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 91 and 92: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 93: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 97 and 98: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Parc
Page 99 and 100: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Appropriate Safekeeping P
Page 103 and 104: APPROPRIATE SAFEKEEPING PROCEDURES
Page 113 and 114: RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS In
Page 115: Submitted in compliance with COA Mn
show all

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?