Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES/ACTIVITIES CEDAMCO- CBFMA area OSA – CBFMA area SAHA-CBFMA area PAGTUKAS-CBFMA area Slash and burn farming at CBFMA area of OSA Gmelina trees were cut allegedly to give way to corn plantation Moreover, ridge tops and slopes exceeding 50% were not spared from the practice. As mentioned in the feasibility study, PWRS area is susceptible to soil erosion, which if aggravated by inappropriate farming may cause disaster to the community. CENRO-Malaybalay agrees that for sustainability, SWC practices should be part of management practices. • Absence of policy on the maximum area to be awarded to a PO resulted in the awarding of a relatively large area to a PO which could hardly maintain, sustain and manage such an area. 68
SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES/ACTIVITIES In Dumayop Watershed Subproject, a CBFMA covering 3,780.056 hectares was awarded to DMADAI on March 18, 2002. This is the same PO that implemented the CSD from July 3, 1997 to March 2002. The Chief, CBFM Unit, however, did not endorse the issuance of CBFMA to DMADAI due to: • Although the CSD implementation was substantially funded from establishment to protection and maintenance, the DMADAI experienced difficulty in carrying out this responsibility. • The DENR does not have enough competent people to be assigned in the communities to assist the single CBFMA holder who is tasked to manage a vast and sporadic tract of land. • The geographical attributes of the proposed CBFMA do not guarantee effective management by a single and wavering local entity; • The PO has not yet reached the ideal maturity to handle such big responsibility and accountability despite the very long and expensive empowerment processes it has gone through; • The PO president is not open to criticism for improvement particularly on handling finances of the projects; • The declining participation of the small number of participating community members as project implementation progresses. He then recommended that each sitio should have individual CBFMA and that a sweeping change in the leadership of the PO Federation be undertaken. Despite such observations and recommendation, a CBFMA dated February 22, 2002 covering the entire area of 3,780.056 hectares was awarded to DMADAI. The awarding of the entire area to one PO may have been due to the absence of policy defining the standard area that can be effectively managed and sustained by a PO taking into consideration the project location, POs membership and level of management skills. It was noted that the need to consider the number, capabilities and availability of field implementer in awarding the project area was already recognized in the handbook on community profiling for people-oriented forestry projects. However, the methods and criteria for setting the project limit that can be effectively and sustainably managed by a household/PO member under a given condition were not defined. As observed, the capability of the DMADAI to manage the entire area was indeed questionable. It failed to sustain the 59.34% average survival rate attained upon CSD termination. Inspection by the team in November and December 2005 revealed that the survival rate went down to about 35%, as presented in the next page: 69
Page 1 and 2:
Management Services Report No. 2005
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Page Part I Executive Summ
Page 5 and 6:
Part I Executive Summary 1
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On July 19, 1995,
Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • POs in all se
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY also forwarded ex
Page 13 and 14:
COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22: COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 27 and 28: PENRO INTRODUCTION The DENR is the
Page 29 and 30: PENRO ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The
Page 31 and 32: PENRO BUKIDNON PENR Officer Secreta
Page 33 and 34: PENRO LOCATION/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Page 39 and 40: Part IV Audit Observations 35
Page 41 and 42: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING INTR
Page 43 and 44: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING live
Page 45 and 46: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Live
Page 47 and 48: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING The
Page 49 and 50: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CBFM
Page 51 and 52: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CENR
Page 53 and 54: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Mana
Page 55 and 56: SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANC
Page 71: SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANC
Page 87 and 88: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES INTR
Page 89 and 90: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 91 and 92: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 93 and 94: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 95 and 96: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES acco
Page 97 and 98: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Parc
Page 99 and 100: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Appropriate Safekeeping P
Page 103 and 104: APPROPRIATE SAFEKEEPING PROCEDURES
Page 113 and 114: RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS In
Page 115: Submitted in compliance with COA Mn
show all

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?