Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES/ACTIVITIES Activities Target Cost Accomplishment Physical/ Amount Remarks Replanting Oct. –Dec. , 2004 Procurement of seedlings (bare root) P50,000 Replanting 50,000 P 50,000 50,000 Establishment of greenbelt Procurement of banana suckers 4,000 100,000 100,000 Planting of suckers 4,000 20,000 20,000 Fireline establishment Jan. – Mar. 2005 Amballo 114 has. 48,450 48,450 Dumayop 27 has. 11,475 0 Diffuncian 10 has. 4,250 0 Sinalang 62 has. 26,350 26,350 Tabban 0 0 15,725 Foot Patrol 489 days 97,800 97,800 PMS 40,000 40,000 Oct. 2004-Mar..2005 Total P448,325 P 448,325 During site visits by the team in November and December 2005, kaingin is still being practiced and continues to be a threat to the established plantation as shown in these pictures: Kaingin at Sitio Sinalang, Bonifacio, Quezon, Nueva Vizcaya Charcoal-making at Sitio Sinalang Kaingin at Sitio Dumayop Kaingin at Sitio Burburnai 64
SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES/ACTIVITIES • The CSD implementation of the PWRS was not in accordance with the land use plan defined in the Feasibility Study resulting in increased estimated soil erosion from 303,455.92 tons/year to 390,898.39 tons/year. Moreover, inappropriate upland cultivation which promotes soil erosion is widely practiced. As disclosed in the following documents, PWRS project was designed to prevent soil erosion as the site and watershed areas are generally susceptible to soil erosion: Document Paragraphs 52,176,181 and 182 of Bukidnon Watershed <strong>Management</strong> Plan Framework (BWMPF). PWRS Feasibility Study/ Appraisal Report DAO 98-41 dealt with objectives and strategies to address soil erosion in watershed reservation Provision Soil erosion poses a serious threat to most of the present and potential agricultural areas of the Province. Almost 110,000 ha (13%) is already classified as moderately to severely eroded. Despite the very serious threat soil erosion poses xxx it is not given adequate attention. xxx As such, there is a need to promote indigenous and introduced soil and water conservation technologies to combat the linked problem of rainfall runoff/soil erosion. xxx • The subproject aims to rehabilitate the watershed’s vegetative cover, minimize soil erosion losses and improve the water yield and quality of tributaries and major waterway of Pulangi and Tigua Rivers. • Specifically, the subproject aims, among others, to introduce proper farming techniques to minimize soil erosion. • Estimated average loss of soil is placed at 80.55 tons/ha/year, however, with the implementation of the subproject, the soil loss will reduce to 51.62 tons/ha/year or a 36% reduction. • Section 2.1 – Enhance the conservation, protection and rehabilitation of watershed reservations to reduce soil erosion and sedimentation, improve water yield and quality and promote biological diversity. • Section 4.1.4 – Promotion of land uses and practices that increase productivity and conserve soil, water and other forest resources. Thus, under the feasibility study (FS) for PWRS, agro-forestry and other farming activities shall be confined only in moderate slopes to prevent and minimize occurrence of soil erosion. It was proposed that the PWRS development be undertaken as follows: SLOPE CATEGORY (%) LAND USE 0-15 15-30 30-50 Above 50 TOTAL % Reforestation 48.10 645.12 851.46 348.87 1893.55 32.29 ANR 6.00 481.42 150.09 25.03 662.54 11.30 Rattan Plantation 101.96 475.26 149.94 57.01 784.17 13.37 Agroforestry 600.00 800.00 600.00 200.00 2200.00 37.52 Agro-silvipastoral 76.96 90.94 92.05 23.46 283.41 4.83 Bamboo Plantation 17.57 14.31 4.69 3.25 39.82 0.68 TOTAL 850.59 2507.05 1848.23 657.62 5863.49 100.00 65
Page 1 and 2:
Management Services Report No. 2005
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Page Part I Executive Summ
Page 5 and 6:
Part I Executive Summary 1
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On July 19, 1995,
Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • POs in all se
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY also forwarded ex
Page 13 and 14:
COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 15 and 16:
COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 17 and 18: COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT P
Page 27 and 28: PENRO INTRODUCTION The DENR is the
Page 29 and 30: PENRO ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The
Page 31 and 32: PENRO BUKIDNON PENR Officer Secreta
Page 33 and 34: PENRO LOCATION/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Page 39 and 40: Part IV Audit Observations 35
Page 41 and 42: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING INTR
Page 43 and 44: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING live
Page 45 and 46: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Live
Page 47 and 48: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING The
Page 49 and 50: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CBFM
Page 51 and 52: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING CENR
Page 53 and 54: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Mana
Page 55 and 56: SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANC
Page 67: SOUND IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANC
Page 87 and 88: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES INTR
Page 89 and 90: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 91 and 92: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Prov
Page 93 and 94: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 95 and 96: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES acco
Page 97 and 98: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Parc
Page 99 and 100: ADEQUATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES Mana
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Appropriate Safekeeping P
Page 103 and 104: APPROPRIATE SAFEKEEPING PROCEDURES
Page 113 and 114: RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS In
Page 115: Submitted in compliance with COA Mn
show all

Part II Community-Based Forest Management Program - ppmrn

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?